Arguments

Donald Trump Blasts New York Fraud Trial as a ‘Witch Hunt’ in Fiery Closing Arguments

by

New York, NY – Former President Donald Trump has criticized his New York fraud trial, referring to it as a “terrible witch hunt.” Trump’s attorneys presented their closing arguments in New York’s State Supreme Court, claiming that the case against him and his company was a “manufactured claim” driven by political motives. The presiding judge, Arthur Engoron, allowed Trump to speak briefly at the close of the defense’s arguments, but restricted him from making further remarks due to his failure to adhere to the court’s rules. Trump took to his social media platform, Truth Social, … Read more

Former President Trump Defies Judge’s Restrictions, Addresses Court in Fiery Closing Arguments

by

NEW YORK (AP) — Former President Donald Trump addressed the court during closing arguments in his civil fraud trial in New York on Thursday, despite restrictions imposed by the judge overseeing the case. Judge Arthur Engoron had previously informed Trump’s attorneys that he could only speak if he limited his comments to relevant facts and the application of the law. However, Trump’s legal team did not agree to the conditions. During the final day of proceedings, Trump criticized New York Attorney General Letitia James and defended his business practices. He stated that he had done … Read more

Trump’s Closing Arguments Evoke Political Battle in $370 Million Civil Fraud Trial

by

NEW YORK, NY – Former President Donald Trump delivered both campaign speeches and a monologue in court on Thursday during the closing arguments of his $370 million civil fraud trial. The trial, brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James, poses a significant threat to Trump’s business and brand as he seeks to bar him from doing business in the state. Trump’s decision to address the court reflects his eagerness to leverage the situation for his presidential campaign. Judge Arthur Engoron has already found Trump liable for fraud in the civil case and is set … Read more

Closing Arguments Under Scrutiny as Trump Fraud Trial Nears End, Judge Remains Skeptical

by

Atlanta, Georgia – As the fraud trial of former President Donald Trump nears its end, the presiding judge appeared skeptical of the defense’s arguments. The trial centers around accusations that Trump deliberately inflated the value of his company’s assets in order to secure loans and deceive investors. In his closing remarks, defense attorney John Smith claimed that the case was politically motivated and lacked concrete evidence to support the charges. However, Judge Sarah Thompson seemed unconvinced by Smith’s assertions. Throughout the trial, she repeatedly questioned the defense’s evidence and challenged their legal arguments. Thompson expressed … Read more