Drake’s Legal Team Targets UMG CEO in Battle Over Kendrick Lamar’s Controversial Diss Track

Los Angeles, Calif. — Lawyers representing Drake are seeking access to emails and text messages allegedly sent by Universal Music Group CEO Lucian Grainge regarding Kendrick Lamar’s controversial track “Not Like Us.” The song, released by Interscope Records, a UMG subsidiary, features lyrics that include a direct insult to the Canadian rapper, calling him a “certified pedophile.”

In their lawsuit, Drake, whose full name is Aubrey Drake Graham, accuses UMG of deliberately attempting to increase the visibility of “Not Like Us,” which is seen as a provocative diss track. Alongside Interscope, Drake is also signed to Republic Records, another UMG entity.

The ongoing legal battle has entered a crucial discovery phase, during which both parties exchange relevant documents. However, UMG has refused to provide Grainge’s communications, asserting that he had no significant role in the track’s release or promotion.

As a result, Drake’s attorneys are now requesting a court order to compel UMG to turn over Grainge’s communications. In a motion filed on August 12, attorney Michael Gottlieb argued that UMG’s refusal is unfounded and detrimental to his client’s case. Gottlieb highlighted that the lawsuit cites numerous allegations involving Grainge, particularly concerning UMG’s alleged deceptive practices and plans to harm Drake’s reputation.

Within the motion, Gottlieb asserted that Grainge’s power as CEO gives him significant influence over artists like Lamar. He contended that the executive’s motivation for potentially disparaging Drake may stem from his encouragement of competition within UMG’s roster. This competition might position UMG to leverage more favorable contract negotiations as Drake approaches the end of his current deal.

In addressing UMG’s claims of Grainge’s minimal involvement, Gottlieb pointed out that if that were true, the burden of producing documents from Grainge would be minimal. He argues that transparency in this phase of litigation is essential for justice.

A UMG representative did not respond immediately to requests for comments regarding these developments. The company has previously denied any wrongdoing, framing Drake’s legal actions as a misguided attempt to regain credibility after a public feud with Lamar.

The case is currently under consideration by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas in a New York federal court. She heard arguments for UMG’s motion to dismiss the case earlier this summer, and a ruling is expected soon.

This article was automatically written by Open AI and may contain inaccuracies regarding people, facts, circumstances, or the story. Any article can be requested for removal, retraction, or correction by contacting contact@publiclawlibrary.org.