San Francisco, California — A notable shift is occurring in the corporate landscape regarding contract management, with many businesses discovering they can effectively operate without in-house legal teams. This trend, highlighted by recent studies, suggests that traditional roles within legal departments are evolving, particularly among small and mid-sized enterprises.
Research shows that about 65 percent of companies sampled, totaling more than 1,500 clients, do not employ any attorneys. This is corroborated by a recent study from Thomson Reuters, which indicated that 76 percent of legal departments are now outsourcing routine contract-related tasks. The findings reveal a significant shift in how organizations approach contract ownership, now primarily handled by operational and finance teams rather than legal experts.
As companies increasingly view contracts as essential business processes rather than legal obligations, the results have proven beneficial. Many organizations are thriving under this new paradigm, which emphasizes practicality over strict legal interpretation. A recent survey by KPMG corroborates this perspective, revealing that shifts in contract management responsibilities show that finance and operations now oversee contracts in 57 percent of organizations, up from 35 percent just five years ago.
Interestingly, the majority of contracts processed today lack substantial negotiation. Data indicates that over 90 percent of agreements signed on platforms designed for this purpose are executed without edits. Common practices, such as utilizing templated HR documents or vendor contracts, further illustrate how less negotiation occurs in most business dealings today. Research by World Commerce & Contracting supports this, highlighting that only 10 percent of contracts typically undergo significant negotiation, suggesting that many legal reviews may be unnecessary.
The conversation also involves the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in transforming contract management. While there are fears that AI may replace lawyers, it is actually enhancing existing processes. Contract management software equipped with AI tools enables non-legal personnel to perform initial reviews, identifying potential issues quickly without requiring legal expertise. The American Bar Association has noted that these tools already achieve over 90 percent accuracy in reviews of standard agreements.
As businesses adapt, the inefficiencies associated with traditional contracts are also being reassessed. Experts believe that if contracts were developed today, they would take a far more streamlined format, as evidenced by the World Economic Forum’s estimate that poor contract efficiency costs the global economy over $2 trillion annually.
For companies with fewer than 500 employees, the outlook suggests that by 2035, many may not need legal professionals involved in routine contract management. Recent conversations with a Texas-based construction firm—operating for seven decades without a legal department—underscore this trend. Research from McKinsey forecasts that by 2030, 23 percent of legal work could transition to full automation, with even higher percentages related to routine tasks.
The evolving responsibilities within legal teams focus increasingly on complex strategic matters, as opposed to routine document reviews. This transition has been reported at Fortune 500 companies, where legal departments are adapting to become role enablers rather than mere document reviewers.
As the corporate landscape continues to develop, companies viewing contracts as strategic assets have the potential to excel in this changing environment. Legal professionals must adapt to remain relevant, moving away from routine contract analysis toward offering strategic insights in high-stakes negotiations.
Simplicity is crucial moving forward; companies that embrace this perspective may carve out a competitive edge. A renewed focus on streamlining contract practices will increasingly define business success in the coming years.
This article was automatically generated by Open AI. The individuals, facts, circumstances, and story may contain inaccuracies, and any article can be requested for removal, retraction, or correction by emailing contact@publiclawlibrary.org.