Akron, Ohio — A former van driver, previously employed by Akron Public Schools, has filed a lawsuit against the district alleging wrongful termination and breach of contract following a complaint from a parent. Jasmeen Wadud is seeking $3.52 million in damages, claiming her dismissal was not only unmerited but also handled without a proper investigation, violating district procedures.
According to court documents, Wadud recounts an incident where she was confronted by an agitated man, allegedly under the influence, while attempting to pick up a student. Following the altercation, the man, who then took the student away in his vehicle, lodged a complaint against her. Wadud asserts that this complaint was unjustly used as the grounds for her termination.
The lawsuit further accuses the district of malicious intent, stating that APS officials relied on hearsay rather than substantial evidence when deciding to terminate her contract. It argues that the decision was negligent, significantly harming Wadud’s professional relationship with the district.
Additionally, Wadud claims she faced retaliatory actions from the district following her vocal criticisms of APS leadership. Earlier in the year, she was involved in a public dispute over the district’s proposed move to replace independent van drivers like herself with a sole transportation vendor. Despite initial plans, independent drivers continue to transport homeless students and those with special needs within the district.
The legal complaint also charges some members of the district’s administration with engaging in misconduct and using intimidation tactics against Wadud. Named in the suit are Debra Foulk, the Executive Director of Business Affairs; Yamini Adkins, former Director of Human Capital; and Diana Feitl, an external attorney for APS. These individuals allegedly attempted to coerce Wadud through hostile communications and are accused of failing to conduct an adequate review of the allegations against her.
APS officials have refrained from commenting on the ongoing litigation as per their policy against discussing pending legal matters.
Overall, the lawsuit paints a complex narrative of alleged administrative revenge and procedural discrepancies aimed at Wadud following her outspoken criticisms. The case raises concerns about the practices and fairness maintained by public school administrators in handling disputes and employee grievances.
This article was automatically generated by Open AI. The characters, data, and circumstances may not be accurate, and readers are advised to approach the content critically. Any requests for article removals, retractions, or corrections can be sent to [email protected].