The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is known for its tense and high-stakes deliberations on cases of global importance. Lawyers meticulously present their arguments, utilizing legal provisions and maneuvers to win their cases. However, even in this esteemed court, mistakes can happen, and when they do, they become the talk of the town, especially in the age of social media.
British lawyer Malcolm Shaw recently found himself at the center of attention during the ongoing ‘genocide’ case at the ICJ, where he is representing the Israeli side. As Shaw presented his argument, he suddenly stopped talking, leaving everyone in the courtroom puzzled. It became apparent that he had lost the page he was looking for in his papers. Shaw candidly admitted the mishap, stating, “Well, someone has shuffled my papers.”
While this incident did not question Shaw’s competence or legal expertise, it did provide an amusing moment for social media users. In an international court, where every participant is expected to be in impeccable form, this sight was certainly unexpected.
Although Shaw’s mistake was innocuous and within his rights as a legal representative, it triggered a wave of attention on social media. However, it is crucial to note that no laws or rules were broken during the court proceedings.
The case in question involves South Africa accusing Israel of breaching the UN Genocide Convention in the ongoing war. South Africa asserts that Israel is responsible for a ‘genocide’ and requests the ICJ to compel Israel to cease its military campaign in Gaza. According to the Hamas-run health ministry in Gaza, the war has resulted in the death of at least 23,469 people.
Israel vehemently denies the charges of genocide, setting the stage for a contentious legal battle within the ICJ.
In conclusion, the ICJ remains a revered institution where even the smallest missteps garner attention. British lawyer Malcolm Shaw’s ‘whoops’ moment during the ‘genocide’ case involving Israel became a social media sensation. Despite the amusement, the gravity of the case persists, as South Africa seeks justice for the alleged breach of the UN Genocide Convention. Israel maintains its denial of the charges, setting the stage for a contentious legal battle in the ICJ.