Jury Delivers Not Guilty Verdict in High-Stakes Trial of Former Marine for Choking Death on NYC Subway

New York, NY – The trial of former U.S. Marine Daniel Penny, involving the death of 30-year-old Jordan Neely, concluded in a Manhattan courtroom. Penny faced allegations of criminally negligent homicide after his involvement in a lethal incident aboard a New York City subway in May 2023, where he applied a chokehold to Neely, a homeless man with a known history of mental illness.

The altercation, captured on subway surveillance, lasted six minutes, with Neely becoming unresponsive after being held in the chokehold for over 51 seconds. The death was ruled a homicide by the city medical examiner, attributing the cause directly to the chokehold administered by Penny.

Throughout the trial, questions of justification and excessive force were central, drawing public and media scrutiny. Following significant deliberations, extending over five days and totaling more than 24 hours, Penny was acquitted of criminally negligent homicide on December 9, 2024. Additionally, a secondary count of second-degree manslaughter was dismissed after the jury failed to reach a consensus, further complicating the public’s reaction to the verdict.

The jury, comprised of seven women and five men, maintained privacy throughout the proceedings, a common practice in high-profile cases to shield jurors from public and media pressures.

Jordan Neely’s background added layers of complexity and tragedy to the case. Growing up in New York City, Neely was profoundly affected by the violent death of his mother, Christie Neely, at the hands of her boyfriend when Jordan was just 14. His great-aunt, Mildred Mahazu, recounted how the loss severely impacted Neely, influencing his later years and leading him into periods of hardship. Despite gaining some local fame as a street performer impersonating Michael Jackson, Neely continued to struggle, living intermittently in shelters and suffering from mental health issues.

At the time of his death, Neely was recognized by city services as a “high need individual,” indicating significant vulnerability and a critical need for support, which he periodically received from various homeless outreach services. His plight underscores the ongoing challenges faced by many homeless individuals in urban centers like New York City, navigating inadequate shelter conditions and often insufficient mental health support.

The verdict has sparked a broad spectrum of emotional responses, highlighted by a poignant statement from Neely’s father, Andre Zachery, outside the courthouse. Overcome with grief, Zachery articulated his profound loss and signaled intentions to pursue civil action against Penny, critiquing the judicial system’s handling of his son’s case.

This case raises important questions about societal responsibilities, the adequacy of systems designed to protect the most vulnerable, and the complexities involved in cases of self-defense and lethal force. Legal experts and community leaders continue to debate potential implications for how similar cases might be adjudicated in the future.

As the community and the nation reflect on the outcomes of this trial, the discourse surrounding justice, mental health, and homelessness is likely to evolve, potentially prompting reviews of current policies and practices.

Disclaimer: This article was automatically generated by Open AI. The people, facts, circumstances, and narrative described may be inaccurate. For corrections, retractions, or removals, please contact [email protected].