DEDHAM, Mass. — The retrial of Karen Read, facing charges from a 2022 incident, continued Thursday as jury selection entered its third day with seven jurors already chosen. The process at Norfolk Superior Court, overseen by Judge Beverly Cannone, has involved rigorous vetting, with nearly 200 prospective jurors interviewed since Tuesday. The jury roster so far includes four men and three women selected over the concerted two-day effort, with considerations underway to fill a total of 12 seats, including four alternate jurors.
Cannone advised the prospective jurors of a significant commitment, predicting the trial may extend for six to eight weeks. The previous proceedings in July 2024 concluded without a resolution, leading to this second trial.
The incident in question occurred when John O’Keefe was fatally struck by a Lexus SUV driven by Read in Canton on January 29, 2022. Read, 45, from Mansfield, has pleaded not guilty to charges including second-degree murder, manslaughter while under the influence, and leaving the scene of an accident resulting in death. The defense has portrayed Read as a victim, alleging that O’Keefe was killed inside another individual’s home and later moved outside, contrary to the prosecution’s claims.
Outside the courthouse, the trial’s high profile has prompted enhanced security measures, such as a 200-foot buffer zone, reinstated by Judge Cannone at the prosecution’s request to limit demonstrations. This decision has led to litigation from supporters of Read—Jason Grant, Allison Taggart, Lisa Peterson, and Samantha Lyons—who argue that the buffer violates their constitutional rights to protest. A federal judge is set to consider their lawsuit on Friday.
The case has attracted considerable public interest, reflected in the strict security measures and the extensive, ongoing judicial proceedings. As the community watches closely, the outcome of this retrial could set significant precedents regarding legal responsibilities and procedural protections in similar high-profile cases.
The extensive public and media attention surrounding this case highlights ongoing debates about legal reforms, the boundaries of personal rights under the law, and the complexities of handling cases involving public figures or emotionally charged events.
For further developments in this ongoing legal story, enthusiasts and concerned citizens are observing the courthouse activities closely, awaiting more insights from the unfolding legal processes.
This article was automatically generated. Facts, accuracy, and the portrayal of people or events in this story may not be accurate. For corrections or retractions, please contact [email protected].