Megan Thee Stallion’s Defamation Battle: Blogger Milagro Gramz Faces Legal Turmoil and Fundraising Challenge

Los Angeles, California – Megan Thee Stallion is advancing her defamation lawsuit against blogger Milagro Gramz, who is now facing legal challenges without an attorney for the second time in recent weeks. Gramz is accused of orchestrating a smear campaign allegedly for fellow artist Tory Lanez.

Recently, Michael Hayden, a representative from the California nonprofit organization Unite the People Inc., withdrew from the case due to financial constraints, stating in court filings that local Florida legal representation was unaffordable. “Financial difficulties have arisen with Unite the People Inc. and [Milagro Gramz], making it unreasonably difficult for Unite the People Inc. to continue to effectively represent [Milagro Gramz],” Hayden detailed in his withdrawal notice.

Hayden emphasized that Unite the People Inc. only has two attorneys who specialize in criminal law and manage substantial caseloads. Without a local counsel in Florida to lead the defense, he asserted that the organization could not continue its representation without risking financial ruin.

Gramz’s prior Florida attorney, Michael A. Pancier, also stepped back from the case earlier in May, citing unpaid fees and fundamental disagreements regarding their representation.

Megan Thee Stallion’s lawsuit alleges that Gramz disseminated false rumors involving perjury, issues relating to alcoholism, and challenges with mental health. The legal action further claims that Gramz distributed a digitally manipulated pornographic video of the rapper, intensifying the allegations against her.

Now representing herself, Gramz is seeking financial assistance through a crowdfunding campaign titled “Save New Media,” aiming to raise $100,000 to cover her legal expenses. She asserts that the lawsuit represents an unjust attack against her independent voice in media.

So far, Megan Thee Stallion has not publicly addressed the ongoing situation, leaving many questions unanswered as the case develops. Public interest remains high as the two public figures navigate this contentious courtroom battle.

This article was automatically generated by Open AI, and the facts, circumstances, and story details may contain inaccuracies. Any article can be requested for removal, retraction, or correction by emailing contact@publiclawlibrary.org.