NEW YORK – Daniel Penny, a 26-year-old Marine veteran, was acquitted of criminally negligent homicide in a New York City court following the chokehold death of Jordan Neely on a subway. The not guilty verdict was delivered after jurors were unable to reach a unanimous decision on the more severe charge of second-degree manslaughter, which was then dismissed by the judge.
The jury deliberated for over 20 hours before concluding that Penny, who had previously pleaded not guilty to both charges, did not commit criminally negligent homicide. Upon hearing the verdict, Penny appeared relieved, and his legal team expressed gratitude, emphasizing that the decision allows residents to defend each other without forfeiting their freedoms.
The case originated from a May 2023 incident on an F train in SoHo, where Neely, reportedly experiencing homelessness and with a history of mental illness, began exhibiting threatening behavior. Penny intervened by restraining Neely with a chokehold, which he maintained until Neely ceased moving. Despite emergency responders’ efforts at revival, Neely was pronounced dead at the scene.
Subsequently, Penny faced significant legal and public scrutiny. His trial included testimonies from over 30 witnesses and extensive review of medical records, videos, and forensic analysis.
Outside the courthouse, reactions to the verdict were mixed. Protests erupted with chants of “Justice for Jordan Neely!” echoing the discontent of some community members. Donte Mills, attorney for Neely’s family, emphasized the need for community support, urging people to support each other in addressing basic needs, highlighting mistrust in systemic solutions.
In contrast, figures such as Vice President-elect JD Vance and New York Congressman Mike Lawler criticized Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg for pursuing charges against Penny. Their sentiments reflect a broader debate on the handling of such cases by the legal system.
Mayor Eric Adams commented on the case, noting that it serves as a reflection of New York’s spirit of intervention in moments of perceived danger, though it should not encourage vigilantism. He stressed the importance of a fair trial where jurors assess the case based solely on evidence presented.
Jordan Neely’s death has intensified discussions around mental health and the treatment of vulnerable populations, particularly within the public transit system. Advocates argue that more comprehensive care and understanding might prevent such tragedies.
In conclusion, Daniel Penny’s acquittal marks the end of a legal battle but ignites broader debates about justice, community responsibilities, and the handling of mental health crises in public spaces.
This article was generated by OpenAI and may contain inaccuracies in the people, facts, circumstances, or story reported. Errors can be corrected or content retracted by contacting [email protected].