San Francisco, California — As food technology advances toward widespread commercialization, labeling and naming new ingredients has emerged as a contentious issue that blends regulatory compliance with brand image and consumer trust. A recent lawsuit against Perfect Day, a prominent player in the food tech sector, shines a spotlight on the complexity of ingredient labeling, particularly for products developed through innovative processes.
The Organic Consumers Association and Toxin Free USA have filed a lawsuit against Perfect Day, challenging the terminology used to describe its core ingredient, branded as ProFerm. This ingredient is marketed as “animal-free whey protein,” a claim the plaintiffs argue is misleading due to residual byproducts from the fermentation process that differentiate it from traditional cow-derived whey protein.
The plaintiffs rely on a highly sensitive testing method, which is not standard for evaluating food ingredients, to support their claim that the fermented product does not match the purity of its animal-derived counterpart. They contend that the use of the label “whey protein” suggests a level of similarity and integrity that is not present.
From a regulatory standpoint, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a “no questions” letter regarding ProFerm’s Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status. However, this expression of approval did not comment on the appropriateness of the ingredient’s name. The FDA has indicated that allergenic milk proteins must be disclosed clearly, regardless of the terminology used.
Perfect Day has opted to describe its ingredient as whey protein derived from microflora, an effort to highlight its milk-like characteristics while maintaining transparency. This lawsuit serves as a reminder of the delicate balance companies must strike when navigating the increasingly complicated landscape of alternative ingredient naming.
Food tech firms are increasingly investing in proprietary names for their innovations. However, regulations mandate that a common or usual name be used in labeling. The challenge lies in how to accurately reflect the nature of an ingredient that is both familiar and novel, without causing consumer confusion. Guidance from the FDA on such matters remains vague, and no clear standards have been established for naming ingredients produced through unconventional processes.
In practice, many alternative ingredients adopt the same common names as their traditionally sourced equivalents. For instance, precision fermentation has allowed for the production of rennet since 1990, yet it continues to be labeled under the same name as its animal-derived variant.
Emerging technology companies face unique vulnerabilities in the absence of a pre-market review process for ingredient nomenclature. While businesses may consult with the FDA during the GRAS submission process, the agency typically refrains from judging the appropriateness of proposed ingredient names. In fact, its Office of Food Additive Safety often directs inquiries toward the Office of Nutrition and Food Labeling for such matters.
This regulatory framework allows companies to choose ingredient names that best match their market positioning. However, it also opens the door for potential legal challenges over claims of misleading terminology. Companies like Perfect Day, which produce alternatives to animal-based ingredients, face considerable risks due to their innovative processes and the potential backlash from conventional food industry interests.
To mitigate these risks, companies are advised to clearly explain their marketing claims regarding new ingredients. Pairing labels like “animal-free” with straightforward descriptions of production methods on packaging can enhance consumer understanding. Additionally, maintaining robust testing documentation can fortify a company’s position against legal scrutiny.
Amid the evolving landscape of food technology and regulation, the case surrounding Perfect Day exemplifies the challenges facing companies committed to innovation while ensuring transparency and compliance. The complexities of ingredient naming and labeling are more than mere semantics; they are pivotal to the future of food technology and consumer trust.
This article was automatically written by OpenAI, and the people, facts, circumstances, and story may be inaccurate. Any article can be requested for removal, retraction, or correction by writing an email to [email protected].