SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge heard arguments on Tuesday regarding the Mountain West Conference’s request to dismiss a lawsuit brought by the Pac-12 over $55 million in so-called “poaching fees.”
Judge Susan van Keulen did not issue a ruling during the hearing. The Pac-12 issued a statement reaffirming its commitment to the legal action against the Mountain West, expressing confidence in its position while emphasizing its dedication to academic excellence and athletic tradition.
The dispute centers on a poaching clause in a scheduling agreement signed by the Pac-12 for last season. The clause required payments to the Mountain West of $10 million for the first team to depart, with an additional $500,000 for each subsequent team. This sum is separate from exit fees exceeding $17 million that member schools must pay under a different agreement.
Looking ahead, Colorado State, Utah State, San Diego State, Fresno State, and Boise State are set to join the Pac-12 in 2026, intensifying the stakes of the ongoing legal battle.
Last year, the Pac-12 filed a federal antitrust lawsuit against the Mountain West, seeking to challenge the validity of the poaching fees. The parties involved met for mediation but failed to reach a settlement, prompting the Pac-12 to call for Tuesday’s hearing concerning the dismissal motion.
The outcome of this case could have significant implications for the structure of collegiate athletics, particularly with the ongoing realignment of conferences as schools seek more lucrative opportunities. The focus now shifts to Judge van Keulen as she deliberates the arguments presented.
This unfolding situation is being closely monitored by other college athletics conferences, as decisions here may set precedents in similar disputes in the future.
The article was automatically written by Open AI and the people, facts, circumstances, and story may be inaccurate. Any article can be requested for removal, retraction, or correction by writing an email to contact@publiclawlibrary.org.