Marshall, Texas – A federal judge has ordered a new damages trial in the patent infringement case between Samsung Electronics Co. and G+ Communications LLC. The $67.5 million award previously granted to G+ Communications was wiped out due to possible jury confusion during deliberations, according to Judge Rodney Gilstrap.
The January verdict, which found Samsung guilty of infringing on 5G smartphone technology, has been deemed unreliable. The companies involved failed to properly educate the jury on the distinction between running and lump sum royalties, leading to potential misunderstanding. This ruling has significant implications for both parties involved.
During the trial, it was alleged that Samsung used unlicensed technology in its Galaxy 5G smartphones. The jury found the electronics giant liable and awarded G+ Communications $67.5 million in damages. However, Judge Gilstrap’s recent ruling acknowledges the potential confusion that may have influenced this decision.
The distinction between running royalties, which are ongoing fees based on product sales, and lump sum royalties, which are one-time payments, is crucial in this case. It appears that the jury may not have fully understood this distinction, leading to an unreliable verdict.
As a result of this ruling, a new damages trial will take place in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Both Samsung and G+ Communications will have the opportunity to present their arguments and evidence once again. This presents a chance for a fairer and more accurate verdict to be reached.
The outcome of this case will have significant financial implications for Samsung. If the damages awarded in the new trial are either reduced or eliminated, the company could save millions of dollars. On the other hand, a second favorable verdict for G+ Communications could potentially secure an even larger award.
This ruling highlights the importance of clear communication and education during jury trials. It emphasizes the need for both parties to effectively explain complex concepts to ensure a fair and accurate outcome. Ultimately, the new trial will provide an opportunity to clarify any confusion and resolve this patent infringement dispute once and for all.