Controversial Laws Enforced: Montana’s Housing Supply Stifled as Homeowners Challenge Constitutionality

BOZEMAN, Mont. – Two new laws aimed at boosting Montana’s housing supply have been temporarily halted by a district court judge. Homeowners have filed a lawsuit, arguing that the laws are unconstitutional and will negatively impact property values. The judge’s ruling has garnered frustration from advocates and lawmakers who believe it will hinder the construction of much-needed housing.

Gallatin County District Court Judge Mike Salvagni has blocked the implementation of two laws that would require cities to permit the construction of more multi-family and accessory dwelling units, irrespective of local regulations. The blocked laws were part of a larger legislative package designed to address Montana’s affordable housing crisis.

Judge Salvagni explained that he chose to halt the laws to prevent any potential irreparable harm. However, he has allowed two other laws being challenged in the homeowners’ suit to remain in effect. These laws, also related to housing density, will continue to be debated in the ongoing litigation.

The group of homeowners who filed the lawsuit claim that the new rules would endanger property values and infringe upon their constitutional rights to public participation, equal protection, and due process in land use planning. They argue that the laws should be invalidated.

Both advocates and lawmakers from across party lines have expressed frustration with the judge’s ruling, emphasizing that it will hamper the construction of much-needed housing in Montana. Republican Sen. Greg Hertz of Polson stated that the laws were thoroughly vetted through the normal legislative process.

Nathan Dugan, a representative from the nonprofit Shelter WF, voiced concerns about the ruling’s impact on Montanans in dire need of stable housing. He fears that the delay caused by the lawsuit will only prolong the wait for affordable options.

As the lawsuit continues, the fate of these contested housing laws remains uncertain. While some argue that they are crucial for addressing Montana’s affordable housing shortage, others question their constitutionality and potential impact on property values.

In summary, two laws aimed at addressing Montana’s housing shortage have been temporarily blocked by a district court judge. Homeowners have filed a lawsuit, expressing concerns over the laws’ constitutionality and their effect on property values. The judge’s ruling has sparked frustration among advocates and lawmakers who believe it will hinder the construction of much-needed housing. The debate surrounding the laws and their potential impact on Montana’s housing crisis continues as the litigation unfolds.