New Delhi, India — The Delhi High Court has denied bail to a lawyer involved in a road rage incident, emphasizing that such violence in public spaces cannot be tolerated, regardless of the offender’s professional status. The ruling, delivered by Justice Girish Kathpalia, expressed concern that allowing the lawyer to remain free would send dangerous messages to society about accountability.
During the hearing, Justice Kathpalia stated that all individuals must be treated equally under the law, asserting that exceptions based on profession could undermine the integrity of legal advocacy. The judge’s comments came after the accused and his brother were reported to have attacked a software engineer in February while the victim was riding a two-wheeler on Deoli Road. The lawyer had characterized the incident as “mere road rage,” but the judge strongly disagreed.
Justice Kathpalia referenced CCTV footage, which provided clear evidence of the extent of the violence perpetrated by two affluent individuals—a lawyer and the president of a political organization—underscoring their responsibility as members of society to adhere to the law. The footage played a critical role in the court’s decision, revealing the aggression displayed by the accused.
Additionally, the victim endured significant injuries, including a head wound that could have been life-threatening. The judge noted that road rage incidents, while often dismissed casually, can lead to serious physical harm and psychological trauma for victims, along with potential fatalities. He reiterated that the simple classification of the incident as “road rage” does not capture its broader implications.
The court also highlighted the importance of a thorough investigation, noting a request from the investigating officer for custodial interrogation, aimed at retrieving the weapon used in the assault and advancing the case. Given the serious nature of the charges and the conduct of the accused, the court concluded that this was not an appropriate situation for granting anticipatory bail.
This decision reflects a broader commitment to maintain public order and assert that no one, regardless of their status, should be exempt from the consequences of violent behavior. It sends a clear message about the necessity of accountability and justice in incidents of public violence.
The article was automatically written by Open AI, and the people, facts, circumstances, and story may be inaccurate. Any article can be requested for removal, retraction, or correction by writing an email to contact@publiclawlibrary.org.