Las Vegas, NV — A former cocktail server at Wynn Las Vegas has opted to accept a significantly reduced payout linked to a jury’s decision regarding a violation of her rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act. The court’s decision comes after evaluation of the original jury award, which was deemed excessively high.
U.S. District Court Judge Andrew Gordon approved a remittitur payment of $27,200.75 for Tiare Ramirez, a marked reduction from the jury’s original award of $321,200. Judge Gordon concluded that the amount awarded was flawed and supported Wynn’s request for a new trial focused solely on the financial compensation.
In his ruling, dated July 29, Judge Gordon stated that the evaluation of damages was inadequate, necessitating a review of the award granted after the five-day trial that wrapped up on October 25, 2024. He provided Ramirez with the choice to accept the new lower payment or undergo a new trial to re-examine the damages.
The legal proceedings unfolded after Ramirez asserted that her employer had violated her rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act. This act is designed to protect employees who need time off due to medical issues or family emergencies, ensuring they can return to work without penalty.
The case drew attention as it exemplified the challenges faced by workers navigating their rights in the hospitality industry. As employees in such high-pressure environments frequently deal with issues related to health, family responsibilities, and job security, this case highlighted the broader implications of workplace rights in Las Vegas and beyond.
Ramirez’s case has the potential to influence how similar claims are handled in the future, particularly in high-stakes industries like gaming and hospitality, where workers often depend heavily on their rights under federal labor laws.
The legal landscape surrounding the Family and Medical Leave Act remains a critical topic within employment law as judges and legislators evaluate existing protections for workers.
This outcome underscores the complexities of workplace rights and serves as a reminder for employees to remain vigilant about their entitlements.
This article was automatically generated by OpenAI. The information, facts, and circumstances presented may not be completely accurate. Any article can be requested for removal, retraction, or correction by emailing contact@publiclawlibrary.org.