HONOLULU — A longstanding dispute involving discrimination allegations against the Honolulu Liquor Commission and the City concluded abruptly with a settlement on the seventh day of a non-jury trial at the Federal Court in downtown Honolulu. The plaintiffs, Scarlet Honolulu and Gay Island Guide, reached an agreement that included monetary compensation and significant policy changes within the commission.
Joseph Luna, co-owner of Scarlet Honolulu, delivered a poignant testimony that significantly influenced the course of the trial. Luna recounted years of discrimination that culminated in an incident in 2021 when he was allegedly pushed by a liquor inspector during stringent COVID-19 restrictions. His emotional narrative brought many in the courtroom to tears, highlighting the deep-rooted issues of bigotry within the regulatory body.
Walter Enriquez, owner of Gay Island Guide and a fellow plaintiff, emphasized the emotional weight of Luna’s testimony. “Having someone physically disregard you, to move you aside as if you’re nothing, captures the essence of our grievances,” he explained. This sentiment is what pushed the parties towards a swift resolution.
Following the impactful testimony, the parties negotiated a settlement agreement that includes a payment of $670,000 to the plaintiffs. More importantly, it mandates structural changes aimed at fostering transparency and fairness. The agreement stipulates that liquor investigators must wear body cameras, and inspections will be assigned randomly via computer. It also calls for quarterly monitoring and reports to federal court, alongside a review to be carried out by the City Managing Director and commissioners.
“I want people to remember not to stop advocating for justice, no matter how difficult it gets. Persistence can foster change,” said Robbie Baldwin, another co-owner of Scarlet Honolulu, stressing the importance of perseverance in the fight against systemic discrimination.
Testimonies from the Honolulu Liquor Commission’s current and former administrators further exposed operational flaws, painting a picture of a dysfunctional agency. A few inspectors also took the stand, consistently denying any biased behavior, though their testimonies were perceived as disingenuous by some, including Baldwin.
The agreement is pending approval from the City Council, with city officials currently refraining from commenting. “As the settlement is still pending City Council approval, we are unable to provide any comment at this time,” said Mike Formby, Managing Director.
This case highlights significant challenges within city regulatory bodies and underscores the persistent issues of discrimination that marginalized communities face, reminding the public and policymakers of the ongoing need for vigilance and reform in governmental operations to ensure equality and justice for all.