JOLIET, Ill. — A local man charged with aggravated domestic battery is back in police custody after a judge revoked his pretrial release for breaching its conditions. Daniel Naroleski, 41, faced arrest on Friday after allegedly entering the residence of the woman he is accused of assaulting.
Judge Tom Slazyk granted the prosecution’s request to revoke Naroleski’s pretrial release following his arrest. He was subsequently remanded to the Will County jail. The charges stem from an incident on September 17, 2024, though formal charges were not filed until July 17 of this year.
The circumstances surrounding the case revealed that the alleged victim accused Naroleski of multiple acts of violence, including hitting her with a glass bottle, strangulation, biting, and making threats against her life. In light of these allegations, the prosecution sought to keep Naroleski incarcerated under the SAFE-T Act.
However, Judge Amy Bertani-Tomczak earlier denied the request to hold Naroleski in jail without bond. She stated that certain conditions could mitigate the risks associated with his pretrial release. Among those conditions, Naroleski was ordered to avoid any possession of firearms and to maintain a distance of 3,000 feet from the woman and her residence. However, the judge did not mandate that he undergo electronic monitoring or any form of home confinement.
Naroleski was released from jail shortly after 1 p.m. on the same Friday he was arrested. After his release, officers provided him with personal belongings at a nearby gas station, cautioning him not to return to the victim’s home.
Despite these warnings, police conducted a welfare check at the woman’s residence later that evening. At approximately 8:22 p.m., officers suspected Naroleski may have reentered her home. They arrived and took him into custody without incident as he exited the building.
The case highlights serious concerns regarding domestic violence, particularly given Naroleski’s prior convictions for aggravated battery and domestic violence in Will County from 2014 and 2015. As the legal process unfolds, authorities will remain vigilant in monitoring his compliance with the court’s orders.
This article was automatically generated by Open AI, and any inaccuracies regarding the individuals, events, or facts contained herein may exist. Corrections and removal requests can be directed to contact@publiclawlibrary.org.