STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. – A power couple consisting of the district attorney and a state Supreme Court judge in Staten Island is facing criticism for “double dipping” by receiving substantial taxpayer-funded salaries and pensions. District Attorney Michael McMahon and Judge Judith McMahon are both earning six-figure salaries while also collecting government pensions, according to sources. McMahon retired from government service in December but continues to serve as the borough’s chief prosecutor. It is likely that his pension is over $130,000.
The situation has raised eyebrows among political insiders, who believe it is not a good look for a district attorney to be double dipping. While it is legal, some argue that it is not right. Judge Judith McMahon, on the other hand, is paid $210,900 and also receives a $122,916 pension. Together, the couple is pulling in more than $600,000 in compensation from their combined pay and pensions.
The move is not uncommon, especially among state lawmakers, who are allowed to retire and collect a pension while still in office. However, some feel that the pension system was not designed for this kind of situation. Critics argue that pensions are meant for government employees after they stop working, not while they are still serving in their positions.
In response to the criticism, a spokesperson for DA McMahon defended the decision to receive a government pension while still serving as the paid prosecutor. The spokesperson stated that it is a common practice for those in public service to retire when eligible, as not retiring would put their families at risk of receiving no pension at all if they were to die.
While critics may find this practice unseemly, pension experts argue that McMahon is entitled to collect his pension and continue working. Additionally, they point out that he may have made the decision not to run for office again, which means he does not have to worry about political blowback.
The issue of double dipping is not limited to McMahon and Judge McMahon. Many judges “retire” to collect a pension while still in office, although they forfeit the right to serve as a judge after reaching the mandatory retirement age of 70.
As of now, neither McMahon nor Judge McMahon has provided a comment on the situation. However, their actions have ignited a debate about the appropriateness of double dipping among public officials.