WASHINGTON — A recent study indicates a correlation between restrictive state abortion laws and a rise in births diagnosed with cyanotic congenital heart disease (CCHD), which includes severe cardiac defects reducing the amount of oxygen delivered to the body. This research, which was presented at the American College of Cardiology’s Annual Scientific Session, is the first examination of severe congenital malformations following the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision in June 2022.
The study contrasted states with strict abortion regulations to those maintaining protective abortion policies. Notably, the incidence of CCHD in states with restrictive abortion laws showed an appreciable increase, whereas the rates in states with protective measures remained steady.
According to Stephanie Tseng, MD, an assistant professor and pediatric cardiologist at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, “The healthcare system must gear up for an uptick in these diseases as CCHD patients typically require extensive healthcare services.”
Researchers analyzed data sourced from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, reviewing birth certificates dated from 2016 to 2024 across 29 states. Among these states, 20 had enforced restrictive abortion legislation post-Dobbs, and the remaining nine upholding the most liberal abortion policies.
CCHD is a deadly cluster of heart anomalies found in about 1 in every 100 babies globally, striking approximately 40,000 infants annually in the U.S. Despite their critical condition—resulting in a 15% to 20% mortality rate within the first year—the advancement in medical treatments has significantly increased survival rates, allowing over 90% of these children to reach adulthood.
The study revealed a median monthly alarming differential of 9.6 babies with CCHD per 100,000 births between states based on their abortion laws. This observed rate post-Dobbs was compared against expected rates derived from trends prior to the ruling, signaling a tangible effect from the change in law.
Results indicated only associative links, not causative factors, as per Tseng. Other influences like prenatal care quality, diagnostic timing of CCHD, and maternal health conditions such as diabetes could also delineate disparities between states.
Further, the study suggested the possible consequence of restricted abortion access leading to increased births where the pregnancy might have been terminated under less stringent laws due to severe prognosis.
Tseng highlighted the ongoing challenges and noted that while significant progress has been made in treating these heart defects, “the reality remains that some defects are extremely grave and lack viable surgical remedies.”
Although the data analysis provides an insightful glimpse into public health impacts following legal changes to abortion, limitations in data granularity restrained specific insights into types of CCHD or the exact timing of diagnosis. Researchers advocate continuous long-term observation of these trends to better grasp the repercussions of restrictive abortion laws on public health.
This article was generated with the assistance of automation through OpenAI technology. The content, including people, facts, and other details may not be accurate. Corrections or removal requests for this article can be directed to contact@publiclawlibrary.org.