Exploring the Profound Effects of FRE 702 Amendments on Mass Tort Litigation Dynamics

WASHINGTON — Sweeping amendments to Federal Rule of Evidence 702, slated to take effect this December, are expected to transform how expert testimony is examined in mass tort litigation. These amendments aim to bring more rigor to the process of qualifying expert witnesses and their testimonies in court, amidst rising concern that dubious expert evidence has too often swayed jury decisions. Legal experts predict that with the implementation of these changes, courts will employ a stricter standard when determining the admissibility of expert testimony. The adjustments to Rule 702 emphasize that the testimony must not … Read more

New FRE 702 Amendments Set to Transform the Landscape of Mass Tort Litigation

Washington, D.C.— A significant amendment to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 has sparked widespread attention, particularly within the mass tort litigation community. This revision, which aims to tighten the admissibility standards for expert testimony, could markedly transform legal strategies and case outcomes across the country. Federal Rule of Evidence 702 pertains to the qualification and testimony of expert witnesses, whose insights often play a pivotal role in jury decisions. Historically, the rule allowed experts a broad scope to provide opinions, provided they were grounded in sufficient facts or data and reliably applied the principles involved. … Read more