Rapper Plies, represented by attorney Aaron J. Thornton, has initiated a lawsuit targeting major figures in the music industry, including Megan Thee Stallion, GloRilla, Cardi B, and Soulja Boy. The core of the legal dispute centers on the claim that the 2024 song “Wanna Be” unlawfully samples Plies’ 2008 chart-topper “Me & My Goons.”
The assertion has not only sparked legal actions but also triggered a considerable backlash among fans who perceive the lawsuit as unfairly pointed towards prominent Black female artists. Addressing these concerns, Thornton underscored that the legal action hinges on rights and compensations, not personal grievances against these artists.
“This is about ensuring all creators are fairly compensated for their contributions,” Thornton stated, emphasizing that Plies has always been a supporter of Black female artists and that the lawsuit is directed at the entities holding financial control rather than the performers themselves.
Specifically, the lawsuit targets Universal Music Group, the entity alleged to hold the financial stakes and authority over the disputed track. Thornton pointed out that the principal aim is to seek appropriate remuneration from those profiting from the song. “Our legal efforts are focused on those who financially benefit the most from what we claim are our client’s rights,” he added.
Thornton further reiterated that there is a mutual respect between Plies and the accused artists, highlighting Plies’ appreciation for their artistry. “Plies holds nothing but respect for the talents of Megan and GloRilla,” he said.
For the rapper, the lawsuit underscores a broader issue within the music industry—fair pay and respect for artists’ intellectual property. This matter not only affects Plies but potentially all artists who contribute their creative outputs to the music industry.
As the legal proceedings unfold, the music community and its observers are keen to see how this case might influence future interactions between artists, particularly in terms of mutual respect and rightful compensation. Moreover, the outcome of this high-profile lawsuit could set a precedent affecting how samples and music rights are managed in an industry that frequently recycles and reinterprets past works.
This article was automatically written by OpenAI, and without impacting the integrity of the narrative, may contain details that are not entirely accurate. Readers or persons affected by the content can seek corrections or retractions by contacting contact@publiclawlibrary.org.