Los Angeles, California — Blake Lively is reportedly grappling with her emotional distress claims in an ongoing lawsuit against Justin Baldoni, which has sparked significant media attention. Legal documents indicate that Lively may withdraw certain claims related to emotional distress, a move prompted by Baldoni’s request for her medical and mental health records.
On June 2, Baldoni’s legal team filed a letter to the presiding judge revealing that Lively was considering eliminating these claims from her lawsuit. The request for sensitive medical documentation has not been well received by Lively, who is hesitant to comply, adding complexity to the proceedings.
Baldoni’s attorney, Bryan Freedman, noted that discussions have taken place with Lively’s team. According to Freedman, while Lively is inclined to withdraw her emotional distress claims, she wishes to do so without prejudice, allowing for the possibility of refiling them in the future. In contrast, Baldoni’s legal representatives are advocating for the claims to be dismissed with prejudice, meaning Lively could not bring them back before the court later.
Another attorney on Baldoni’s team, Kevin Fitz, criticized Lively’s approach, stating, “She can’t have it both ways.” This exchange underscores the contentious nature of the case, as both teams navigate various legal strategies.
In response, Lively’s representatives labeled Baldoni’s actions as a publicity stunt. They emphasized that the legal maneuver is routine in such cases, implying that their focus remains on preparing for trial. They reaffirmed that Lively continues to assert claims of emotional distress alongside serious allegations of sexual harassment and retaliation, which are central to her lawsuit seeking $400 million in damages.
This lawsuit, stemming from incidents reported on the set of their film “It Ends With Us,” includes other co-defendants such as Baldoni’s public relations team and the executives of Wayfarer Studios, the production company involved in the movie.
The trial is scheduled to commence on March 9, 2026, as both parties prepare for what is anticipated to be a highly publicized legal battle.
This article was automatically generated by Open AI. The people, facts, circumstances, and story may be inaccurate. Any article can be requested for removal, retraction, or correction by emailing contact@publiclawlibrary.org.