A jury in San Jose, California, has determined that Google mishandled data from idle Android phones, leading users to incur unexpected cellular costs while the devices remained inactive. The judgment, which amounts to over $314 million, is seen as a significant development in the ongoing concerns surrounding the tech giant’s data privacy practices.
The case, initiated in 2019 on behalf of approximately 14 million residents of California, contended that Google’s background data collection for targeted advertising went beyond what an average user would understand or consent to. Plaintiffs argued that this collection resulted in unnecessary data charges, benefiting Google’s advertising revenue.
In response, Google maintained that users agreed to data transfers through its terms of service and asserted that no harm was caused. However, jurors were unconvinced, leading to a ruling that highlights the perceived extent of Google’s data practices and their implications for users.
Jose Castaneda, a spokesperson for Google, described the verdict as a significant setback and announced plans to appeal. He claimed the ruling misinterpreted essential aspects of security and performance services that the company provides.
Attorney Glen Summers, representing the plaintiffs, expressed that the jury’s decision vindicates the lawsuit’s claims and emphasizes what he described as Google’s misconduct. This ruling is particularly noteworthy as it signifies a growing legal challenge against large tech companies regarding their data collection strategies.
This landmark verdict is likely not the final word on the matter. A separate federal class action suit is slated for trial in April 2026, which involves Android users outside of California. If successful, this federal case could potentially increase damages and expand the implications of the California ruling nationwide.
The significant jury award underscores the legal vulnerabilities tech giants face as scrutiny over transparent data practices intensifies. It may serve as a catalyst for similar lawsuits in other states, as consumers become increasingly aware of how their data is being used.
Investors and industry observers will closely watch the progress of Google’s appeal and the upcoming federal trial for indications of potential liabilities or adjustments to Android’s data-collection practices.
This outcome serves as a cautionary tale for technology companies navigating the complex landscape of data privacy and consent, reinforcing the need for transparency in user agreements.
This article was automatically written by Open AI, and the people, facts, circumstances, and story may be inaccurate. Any article can be requested for removal, retraction, or correction by writing an email to contact@publiclawlibrary.org.