Federal Judge Approves Lawsuit by Gaetz and Greene Against California Cities Over Political Event Cancellations

Anaheim, California – A federal judge has ruled that Republican representatives Matt Gaetz of Florida and Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia can proceed with their lawsuit against two California cities that canceled their political events. The decision by U.S. District Judge HernĂ¡n Vera allows the lawmakers to move forward with their suit, which alleges that the cities discriminated against them based on their political views. However, Judge Vera stated that Gaetz and Greene’s attempt to blame civil rights organizations was misguided.

In 2021, three California venues that were scheduled to host “Put America First” rallies canceled their plans due to concerns over the divisiveness associated with the two lawmakers. Initially planned in Laguna Hills, the event was then relocated to Riverside before finally being moved to Anaheim.

To protest the cancellations, Gaetz and Greene organized a “Free Speech Peaceful Protest” outside the Riverside City Hall. Over 100 people attended the demonstration, displaying signs in support of the lawmakers.

Gaetz and Greene have gained national attention for their disruptive presence within the House Republican Conference and their staunch support of former President Trump. They are among the most outspoken members of the conference.

Riverside attempted to have the lawsuit dismissed, but Judge Vera ruled that the lawmakers have presented sufficient allegations that the city delegated its final policymaking authority, allowing the suit to proceed.

In addition to the cities, the lawsuit also names several groups as co-defendants, including the League of Women Voters, the NAACP, the League of United Latin American Citizens, Unidos for La Causa, and Women’s March Action, among others.

This ruling marks another development in the ongoing legal battle between Gaetz, Greene, and the California cities that canceled their events. The lawsuit raises important questions about free speech, political discrimination, and the role of local governments in permitting or disallowing political gatherings. Both sides will now have the opportunity to present their arguments and evidence as the case moves forward in court.