Washington, D.C. — The Fourth of July weekend saw President Trump and congressional Republicans celebrating the passage of what they termed the “big, beautiful bill.” The legislation, which the President signed into law at the White House on July 4, has been met with a mix of jubilation from Republican lawmakers and staunch opposition from Democrats.
All Texas Republicans in the House, as well as Senators John Cornyn and Ted Cruz, supported the legislation, while Democratic lawmakers universally opposed it, labeling it “one ugly bill.” The legislative process involved extensive negotiations among Republicans, culminating in a measure that includes $4.5 trillion in tax cuts. This law aims to make existing tax rates and brackets permanent, with notable changes such as the removal of taxes on tips and overtime pay, which are otherwise capped and temporary. Additionally, the child tax credit will increase from $2,000 to $2,200.
The law also introduces a substantial $930 billion reduction in Medicaid growth over the next decade. The Congressional Budget Office projects that nearly 12 million individuals could lose Medicaid coverage by 2034 due to new work requirements implemented under the law. In an interview, Republican Representative Keith Self from McKinney contended that these cuts are essential for sustaining Medicaid for vulnerable populations, including the poor, disabled, and pregnant women. He emphasized that the program was not designed to support able-bodied adults.
“This provision persists from the pandemic era,” Self remarked. “Individuals should be engaged in the workforce, contributing to the economy, rather than relying on government assistance while being capable of working.” He expressed dissatisfaction with the current situation regarding undocumented immigrants accessing Medicaid, noting a lack of enforcement in the Senate bill compared to prior measures.
Democrats from Texas held a virtual press conference prior to the vote, articulating their concerns. Representative Jasmine Crockett of Dallas stated that their opposition stemmed not from the bill’s partisan origins but from its potential harm to constituents, including Republicans. Representative Marc Veasey of Fort Worth criticized the bill for catering to Trump’s agenda over the needs of Texas residents, suggesting long-term consequences.
The legislation also allocates $350 billion for border security and national security, with Texas set to receive $13.5 billion in reimbursements for its border security initiatives. Despite Republican claims that the tax cuts will spur economic growth, the CBO forecasts a deficit increase of nearly $3.3 trillion over the next decade.
Democrats believe this new law could pose an opportunity for them to regain a majority in the 2026 midterm elections. When questioned on this matter, Self argued that economic performance will dictate electoral outcomes. He indicated that by passing the legislation earlier, unlike in 2017 when it was delayed until December, there would be ample time for its effects to manifest before the midterm elections.
This article was automatically written by OpenAI, and the people, facts, circumstances, and story may be inaccurate. Any article can be requested to be removed, retracted, or corrected by writing an email to contact@publiclawlibrary.org.