Wilmington, Del. — An executive order from President Trump mandates the publication of a list of states and local jurisdictions that hinder federal immigration law enforcement. This initiative aims to identify areas labeled as sanctuary jurisdictions based on their compliance with federal statutes, information-sharing practices, and protections afforded to individuals illegally residing in the United States. Jurisdictions recognized in this list will receive formal notifications regarding their non-compliance, and updates will occur regularly.
Currently, Delaware is classified as a sanctuary state along with New Castle County, and the cities of Camden and Newark. In Camden, local police had tried to partner with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) through a 287(g) agreement on April 29. However, following significant opposition from organizations like the ACLU and the NAACP, this agreement was rescinded just a week later.
Maryland also appears on the list, identifying itself as a sanctuary state. Some counties, including Talbot County, face similar designations. Sheriff Joseph Gamble of Talbot County expressed confusion regarding this classification, stating that his office adheres to federal immigration laws. He noted that Talbot County was not included in the previous year’s ICE report identifying “non-cooperative” jurisdictions.
Gamble emphasized his commitment to transparency and accountability, disclosing that he has engaged with ICE officials to clarify why Talbot County is now labeled as a sanctuary jurisdiction. He reassured the community of their compliance with federal statutes and stated, “The men and women of the Talbot County Sheriff’s Office will continue to serve the citizens of Talbot County diligently.”
In a separate statement, Congressman Andy Harris criticized the designation of both Queen Anne’s County and Talbot County as sanctuary jurisdictions. Harris asserted that these counties do not fit the description and indicated that his office is urging the administration to amend this classification to ensure federal resources are allocated effectively.
As the conversation surrounding immigration enforcement intensifies, local leaders and lawmakers are voicing their concerns and seeking clarification regarding the implications of these designations. The repercussions of being listed as a sanctuary jurisdiction can affect relations between local law enforcement and federal agencies, impacting community trust and cooperation.
The ongoing discussion about sanctuary jurisdictions highlights the broader debate over immigration policy and law enforcement practices in the United States. As communities grapple with these designations, the situation continues to evolve, with local leaders advocating for clarity and fairness.
This article was automatically written by Open AI. The people, facts, circumstances, and story may be inaccurate, and any article can be requested for removal, retraction, or correction by writing to contact@publiclawlibrary.org.