RICHMOND, Va. — In a landmark decision, a Richmond Circuit Court jury has awarded $300 million in damages to three women who claimed they were sexually abused at a Virginia children’s hospital. This verdict marks a significant moment of acknowledgment for the plaintiffs, who endured the alleged abuse while undergoing medical care.
The hospital involved, Cumberland Hospital for Children and Adolescents, located in New Kent, mainly serves a vulnerable youth demographic. The accused, Dr. Daniel Davidow, who served as the hospital’s longstanding medical director, faced allegations from the women of improperly touching them under the guise of performing femoral pulse examinations.
Each of the three women was awarded $60 million in compensatory damages and an additional $40 million in punitive damages. This financial judgment reflects the jury’s acknowledgment of the severity of the misconduct and the impact it had on the victims.
Kevin Biniazan, representing the women, expressed the emotional relief his clients felt when the verdict was delivered. “To have a group of strangers validate their experiences and affirm their dignity is profoundly moving. They broke down in tears, overwhelmed by the vindication,” Biniazan shared, highlighting the cathartic moment for the plaintiffs.
In defense, Bob Donnelly, the attorney for Davidow, claimed the medical procedure in question has been a standard practice since the 1960s and 70s. During the trial, Donnelly emphasized that Davidow strongly denies all allegations of sexual assault associated with these medical exams.
Notably, Dr. Davidow had previously been acquitted in a criminal trial concerning similar allegations made by two other former patients. That acquittal came earlier in April, underlining the complexities and challenges often faced in cases involving historical medical practices and differing interpretations of intent.
The substantial jury award opens up conversations about the safety and oversight in medical institutions, particularly those serving children and adolescents with vulnerabilities. It also raises critical questions about the responsibility of medical professionals in maintaining boundaries and ensuring patient safety.
Moreover, the verdict came after a broader legal challenge involving 46 former patients who have brought lawsuits against Cumberland Hospital and Dr. Davidow, signaling potential systemic issues at the facility.
The case now sets the stage for the next series of legal proceedings, with another civil trial scheduled for March. This continuing legal battle underscores the ongoing scrutiny of practices at children’s medical facilities and the safeguarding of patient rights within such contexts.
As the legal processes unfold, this case remains a poignant reminder of the critical importance of trust and safety in healthcare settings, especially for the most vulnerable in society. The repercussions of this verdict are likely to influence future policies and practices aimed at protecting patients in similar facilities nationwide.