St. Louis, MO – A city judge expressed concerns on Wednesday about a death threat made against him and the jurors who convicted 22-year-old Daniel Riley. The threat was seen as an attempt to influence future judicial proceedings. The judge, Michael Noble, appeared in a video hearing where another judge considered whether to keep 34-year-old Erick M. Buntyn in jail without bond on a charge of tampering with a judicial officer. Buntyn allegedly made the threat right after leaving a St. Louis courtroom following guilty verdicts on two felonies and two misdemeanors. He was sitting with Riley’s family and supporters during the trial.
Judge Noble described the threat as more than just an emotional outburst. He found the timing of it to be impactful. Riley is scheduled to be sentenced next month for a crash that resulted in a teenager losing her legs. Jurors recommended an 18-year and nine-month sentence, but Judge Noble will make the final decision. Riley also faces another pending robbery case in the city, which Judge Noble is presiding over.
The judge believed that Buntyn’s comments were a serious threat and an attempt to influence his future decisions. Due to concerns for his safety, he had to be escorted home that evening by sheriff’s deputies. Precautions were also taken to ensure the safety of the jurors. Judge Noble urged the presiding judge over the case, Judge Jeffrey Sandcork, to deny bond for Buntyn. Buntyn’s attorney argued that it was ridiculous to keep his client locked up, stating that Buntyn had simply made an outburst and had no intention of actually harming anyone.
Prosecutor Tanja Engelhardt stressed the importance of sending a message to those who threaten the judicial process. She stated that the safety of jurors and judges must be protected so that justice can be served without fear. In response, Judge Sandcork ordered Buntyn to be held without bond.
The original article included several supporting assets, such as images, videos, and related articles. It is essential to avoid copying or referencing these assets and to focus solely on the written content of the article.