In a groundbreaking case that could redefine the intersection of technology and law, Jerome Dewald was seen using an AI-generated avatar to argue his case remotely in front of the New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division in March 2025. Representing himself in an employment dispute, Dewald used a digital counterpart created through a San Francisco-based tech product to deliver his legal arguments, a method he believed would offer a clearer and more polished presentation than he could achieve on his own.
The judges, however, were caught off guard upon discovering the avatar’s use during proceedings as they had not been notified in advance about this unusual digital representation. The session was abruptly halted when the nature of Dewald’s representation became clear. Justice Sallie Manzanet-Daniels, expressing her disappointment, highlighted the critical issue of transparency lacking in Dewald’s approach.
Following the incident, Dewald issued an apology, clarifying that his intention was not to deceive but to enhance communication effectiveness through technological means. Despite his rationale, this situation brings to the forefront the escalating concerns about the role of artificial intelligence in legal contexts.
This isn’t an isolated event; there have been other instances where legal professionals have faced scrutiny for employing AI tools. Some of these tools have been accused of fabricating legal precedents, raising serious questions about the accuracy and reliability of AI applications in legal practices.
Contrastingly, the acceptance of AI varies significantly across jurisdictions. For example, the Arizona Supreme Court has implemented AI avatars to disseminate certain rulings to the public, recognizing the potential of technology to aid judicial communication.
Legal experts believe that the incorporation of AI in courtrooms was inevitable, especially as self-represented litigants like Dewald, who lack formal legal guidance, turn to emerging technologies. Yet, this specific case with Dewald remains undecided, leaving much room for legal and ethical discussion.
The employment of AI-generated avatars in such sensitive environments as courtrooms puts a spotlight on the delicate balance between innovation and integrity. Although these digital tools can potentially improve the delivery and understanding of complex legal arguments, they also pose risks related to authenticity and representational accuracy.
As courts continue to grapple with these technological advancements, the need for explicit guidelines governing the use of AI in legal proceedings becomes apparent. Such measures will be crucial in maintaining the procedural decorum and the foundational trust that underpins the judicial system.
In summary, the evolving landscape of law and AI demands cautious navigation to ensure that while technological progress is embraced, it does not compromise the core values of justice and transparency. The legal community, therefore, faces the pressing task of delineating the boundaries within which AI can be ethically and effectively integrated into judicial processes.
This article was generated automatically by Open AI. Accuracy of people, facts, circumstances, and story may vary. Any incorrect details can be reported for removal or correction by emailing [email protected].