Case

Trump Lawyer Drops Conflict Claim in $83.3M Defamation Case, Ending Speculation of BigLaw Overlap

by

New York City, New York – A lawyer representing former President Donald Trump in an $83.3 million defamation case has withdrawn a claim of conflict of interest against the opposing lawyer and the judge. Alina Habba, Trump’s attorney, initially argued that both the plaintiff’s lawyer and the judge had previously worked at the same law firm, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, in the 1990s. However, in a recent letter to U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan of the Southern District of New York, Habba stated that she is now convinced that there was no “mentor-mentee … Read more

Trump Attorney Reverses Controversial Claim of Judge’s ‘Incestuous’ Conflict in E. Jean Carroll Case

by

New York, NY – Alina Habba, one of Donald Trump’s attorneys, has retracted a recent claim regarding a judge’s alleged conflict of interest in E. Jean Carroll’s defamation case against the former president. The claim, which suggested an “insane” and “incestuous” conflict, was based on the judge’s prior association with one of Carroll’s lawyers at a major law firm. However, Habba quickly rescinded her statement after realizing that she herself had briefly worked at the same firm as one of Carroll’s attorneys. The connection between Judge Lewis Kaplan and Roberta Kaplan, who represented Carroll, was … Read more

Philadelphia Jury Awards $2.25 Billion Verdict in Landmark Case Linking Roundup Weed Killer to Cancer

by

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania – A Philadelphia jury has awarded a $2.25 billion verdict to a Pennsylvania man who claims that his cancer was caused by Bayer’s Roundup weed killer. John McKivison, 49, filed a lawsuit against Monsanto Company, which is owned by Bayer, after being diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. McKivison’s lawyers, Tom Kline and Jason Itkin, stated in a joint statement that their client had used Roundup on his property for 20 years. The jury, in a unanimous verdict delivered on Friday, found Monsanto guilty of “50 years of misconduct.” The verdict includes punitive damages amounting … Read more

Verdict Imminent: Jury Deliberates Sotheby’s Art Fraud Case in High-Stakes Trial

by

New York, NY – The jury has begun deliberating in the high-profile art fraud case at Sotheby’s. This case has garnered significant attention due to the multimillion-dollar worth of artwork involved and the alleged fraudulent practices by the defendants. The trial has been ongoing at the Manhattan Supreme Court for several weeks. Prosecutors argued that the defendants, a group of art dealers, engaged in a scheme to deceive buyers and inflate the value of certain artworks sold at Sotheby’s auctions. They claimed that the defendants manipulated provenance documents and forged certificates of authenticity to support … Read more