Louisiana Jury Orders Chevron to Pay $740 Million for Coastal Environment Damage

Baton Rouge, LA — In a landmark decision, a Louisiana jury has ordered Chevron to pay $740 million in damages for their role in coastal erosion and other environmental impacts. This ruling, handed down on Tuesday, marks a significant moment in the ongoing battle between energy companies and environmental preservation efforts in the state. The verdict comes after extensive deliberations following a lawsuit that claimed Chevron’s operations, including decades of oil and gas drilling, significantly contributed to the degradation of Louisiana’s coastal regions. These areas serve not only as critical natural barriers against hurricanes but … Read more

Jury Deliberates in Groundbreaking $2.6 Billion Chevron Trial Over Louisiana Coastal Restoration

Pointe à la Hache, La. — A profound legal clash that could see Chevron facing up to $2.6 billion in damages is unfolding as a Plaquemines Parish jury deliberates the fate of Louisiana coastal wetlands, marking a significant moment in environmental and corporate accountability. The four-week trial centered on allegations that Texaco, acquired by Chevron in 2001, disregarded state environmental laws, contributing to severe land loss and pollution in Breton Sound. The case, initially filed by Plaquemines Parish in November 2013, has finally reached the jury after a series of legal maneuvers including attempts by … Read more

Supreme Court Decision Ends Chevron Doctrine, Bolstering Judicial Oversight and State Power in Federal Regulation

Washington, D.C. – In a decisive and historic move, the U.S. Supreme Court has overruled the longstanding Chevron doctrine, fundamentally shifting the balance of power back toward judicial oversight and away from federal agency autonomy in interpreting ambiguous laws. The Chevron, U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. decision, established 40 years ago, enabled federal agencies to significantly influence regulatory actions, impacting a myriad of sectors across the U.S. The doctrine allowed these agencies to interpret legislation in a manner that often led to an expansion of their regulatory scope, sometimes beyond what was … Read more

Supreme Court Ends Chevron Deference, Restoring Court Oversight Over Administrative Agencies’ Rulemaking Authority

Washington, D.C. – In a historic reversal, the Supreme Wells vented a 40-year-old legal standard that shaped the review of federal agency powers, sparking intense reactions across the United States. The Supreme Court decision dismantles the Chevron Deference, a doctrine relied upon since 1984, which broadly allowed government agencies to interpret ambiguous laws where Congress had not defined clear guidelines. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., a ruling from nearly four decades ago, set a precedent giving agencies leeway to make interpretive decisions on statutes within their jurisdiction, provided they were reasonable. … Read more