Supreme

Supreme Court Temporarily Pauses Ruling on November SNAP Payments

by

On November 7, 2023, the Trump administration sought intervention from the Supreme Court regarding a ruling from a federal judge in Rhode Island. The ruling mandated that the government disburse $4 billion to fully fund the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) for the month of November. This unprecedented order raised significant concerns about the separation of powers, as articulated by U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer. Background of the SNAP Funding Crisis The Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program, commonly referred to as SNAP, is a crucial federal initiative designed to provide food assistance to low-income individuals … Read more

Trump Administration Seeks Supreme Court Intervention on SNAP Funding

by

In a significant legal maneuver, the Trump administration has requested the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene and pause a ruling made by a federal judge in Rhode Island concerning the funding of the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) for November. This request comes in light of a recent order from U.S. District Judge John J. McConnell, Jr., which mandates that the government allocate $4 billion to ensure the full funding of SNAP. The Solicitor General, D. John Sauer, criticized the ruling as an unprecedented challenge to the separation of powers, arguing that the crisis resulting … Read more

Court to Consider Prison Inmate’s Religious Liberty Claims

by

On Monday, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Damon Landor, a Louisiana man whose religious beliefs led him to grow long dreadlocks. The case raises significant questions regarding the balance between institutional authority and individual rights, particularly in the context of religious expression within the prison system. Landor’s situation began in 2020 when prison officials forcibly shaved his head, disregarding a federal appeals court ruling that affirmed his right to maintain his dreadlocks. The Legal Framework: RLUIPA At the heart of this case is the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized … Read more

Supreme Court sides with Trump administration on sex designations on passports

by

The Supreme Court has recently ruled in favor of the Trump administration regarding the sex designations on U.S. passports. This decision comes as a significant moment for both the administration and the ongoing discussions surrounding transgender rights and recognition. The ruling temporarily halts previous court orders that would have allowed transgender and nonbinary individuals to have their chosen sex reflected on their passports, a move that highlights the contentious nature of this issue within the legal landscape. Background of the Case Earlier this year, a federal judge in Massachusetts issued rulings that would have mandated … Read more