Effectively

Judicial Milestone: 19th-Century Antitrust Laws Effectively Restrict Big Tech’s Power, Case Against Google Reveals

by

Washington — A recent federal court ruling against Google has underscored the enduring potency of 19th-century antitrust laws in challenging and regulating the sprawling influence of today’s tech giants. In a groundbreaking decision, the court found Google guilty of maintaining illegal monopolies in search and search advertising markets, highlighting the applicability of older statutes like the Sherman Antitrust Act to modern digital behemoths. Judge Amit Mehta’s detailed opinion, running over 200 pages, points to Google’s strategic control over search distribution channels as a primary factor in stifling competition. The tech company’s agreements with phone manufacturers, … Read more

Empowering Bankruptcy Judges to Effectively Handle Mass Tort Litigations

by

In the world of complex legal battles, bankruptcy courts have proved to be a pivotal avenue for efficiently managing mass tort litigations. The unique structure and function of these specialized courts have allowed them to handle numerous cases that involve large groups of claimants and defendants, such as those arising from widespread damages done by defective products or corporate misconduct. Mass tort cases typically involve plaintiffs from across the country, sometimes numbering in the thousands, who allege harm due to the actions or products of one or more defendants. Coordinating such widespread litigation poses signficant … Read more