Packaging

Jury Awards $2.3 Million in ‘Made in USA’ Label Dispute: Bigelow Tea Faces Legal Repercussions Over Misleading Packaging Claims

by

A recent jury decision in the Banks v. R.C. Bigelow, Inc. case has stirred discussions about national origin marketing claims, as the tea manufacturer was fined $2.3 million. The litigation centered on the validity of Bigelow’s “Manufactured in the USA 100%” labels, which plaintiffs contended were misleading since the raw tea was imported. The company argued that the designation referred only to the blending and packaging processes, which occur in the United States. The court had earlier ruled that the claim was indeed false, leaving the jury to decide on the extent of the damages … Read more

Unlocking Brand Power: Top Design Experts Gather to Judge Revolutionary Packaging at the 2025 PRINT Awards

by

In the realm of consumer goods, the initial interaction between a product and its potential buyer is often silent yet significant. This first impression is not made through taste, smell, or performance, but through packaging. A well-designed package not only embodies the product it contains but also communicates the ethos of the brand, ensuring protection and functionality while setting the stage for consumer experience. From the contours of a bottle to the colors of a wrapper, effective packaging goes beyond mere aesthetics; it performs a pivotal role in guiding consumer choices and fostering brand loyalty. … Read more

PepsiCo Packaging Lawsuit Dismissal Sparks Questions on Consumer vs. Producer Responsibility

by

NEW YORK — A New York judge recently ruled that PepsiCo is not legally liable for pollution potentially caused by the improper disposal of its packaging, setting a precedent that could influence a similar case in California. This decision came after allegations that PepsiCo and its subsidiary Frito-Lay’s single-use plastic packaging contributed to pollution in Buffalo River and nearby waterways. Judge Emilio Colaiacovo of the New York State Supreme Court highlighted that civil liability should not be imposed on manufacturers for the actions of third parties who discard the product. The ruling underscored the existence … Read more

Turning the Tide on Trash: How New U.S. Laws Are Revolutionizing Packaging Responsibilities

by

WASHINGTON — The United States is increasingly adopting Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) laws, implementing regulations that require producers to manage the complete lifecycle of their products, specifically focusing on the environmental impact of packaging waste. This shift underscores a growing national commitment to sustainability and the reduction of packaging waste, which contributes notably to landfill overflow and pollution. EPR laws mark a significant move in environmental legislation, dictating that the responsibility of waste management shifts from consumers and local municipalities to the very producers who design and market the products. With packaging waste recognized as … Read more