Wilmington, NC — As residents of New Hanover County cast their early votes, a pivotal legal battle unfolded in Wilmington’s federal courthouse that could affect the voting processes for nearly a quarter million North Carolina citizens. Seth Waxman, an attorney with the Democratic National Committee, was seen driving past long lines of early voters on his way to court. He was set to advocate for the dismissal of a lawsuit that could complicate voting eligibility verification for these individuals.
The lawsuit, initiated by the North Carolina Republican Party and the Republican National Committee, is among five legal actions filed in 2023 targeting the North Carolina State Board of Elections’ practices. At the heart of the controversy was the board’s interpretation of registration requirements and voter ID laws, an issue unearthed by North Carolina resident Carol Snow in October. Snow discovered discrepancies on the state’s voter registration form which she argued could mislead registrants about essential information needed to confirm their eligibility, such as providing a driver’s license number or the last four digits of their Social Security number.
The Republican plaintiffs have put forward a stark challenge to the board’s decision not to re-verify the identities of approximately 225,000 voters registered with the old, arguably unclear, forms. They argue in the lawsuit that this refusal could jeopardize the integrity of the electoral process, diluting the influence of valid votes and potentially permitting ineligible voting.
Thursday brought a mixed outcome from U.S. District Court Judge Richard E. Myers II who rejected one claim of the lawsuit concerning federal voting laws, stating that the GOP did not have the standing required for the case. However, Myers sent the second claim, concerning allegations of constitutional violations under North Carolina law, back to a state court for further deliberation.
Sarah Boyce, general counsel for the State Board, stands by the decision to adopt the newly designed registration form without engaging in a mass verification effort. She argues that all voters still need to meet mandatory ID requirements under the federal Help America Vote Act (HAVA) and state laws before they can actually vote, whether they registered with the old or new form.
The State Board and the Democratic National Committee have time until October 22 to appeal Myers’ decision to remand the constitutional violation claim to state court. The upcoming sessions in Wake County Superior Court will likely underscore the ongoing tensions between maintaining voter accessibility and ensuring election security, with significant implications for North Carolina voters.
The developments in this case highlight ongoing national debates over voter registration processes and the balance between preventing fraud and promoting broad voter turnout. These legal battles illustrate the intricate and often contentious relationship between state oversight of elections and federal electoral integrity standards.
This article was produced by OpenAI’s language model and may contain inaccuracies regarding people, facts, or the details of the reported events. For corrections, retractions, or to request article removal, please email contact@publiclawlibrary.org.