SAN MATEO, Calif. — San Mateo County Sheriff Christina Corpus faces a potential trial to evaluate her fitness to remain in office, following serious accusations of misconduct. The San Mateo County civil grand jury announced charges alleging willful or corrupt misconduct, according to a statement released by the District Attorney’s Office.
These allegations stemmed from a referral made by the Board of Supervisors in November 2024. The grand jury’s investigation, which unfolded over a month, included testimonies from 32 witnesses, with Sheriff Corpus herself providing a sworn statement. This process was overseen by the San Mateo District Attorney’s Office, which served as an advisor to the civil grand jury.
The specific charges against Sheriff Corpus involve one count of conflict of interest related to her hiring and oversight of Victor Aenlle, a former Executive Director of Administration. The DA’s report indicated that Corpus had a close personal relationship with Aenlle, thus raising concerns about her judgment in this role.
In addition to the conflict of interest charge, Corpus faces three counts of retaliation. These allegations include the controversial termination of Assistant Sheriff Ryan Monaghan, the reassignment of Capt. Brian Philip, and the arrest of Deputy Carlos Tapia, who serves as president of the Deputy Sheriff’s Association.
The civil grand jury reached its decision last Friday, with the DA announcing the results shortly thereafter. Sheriff Corpus is scheduled to appear in court on July 15 at 9 a.m. in Department 9, where she will respond to the charges before Presiding Judge Stephanie Garratt. She is entitled to a jury trial regarding these accusations. If convicted, Corpus stands to be removed from her position.
The outcome of this case may have significant implications for the sheriff’s office and the community it serves, as the allegations have raised questions about leadership and accountability within the department.
The public will be closely watching the proceedings, as the issues surrounding misconduct in law enforcement have garnered increasing attention nationwide. Many will await the court’s decisions with a keen interest in the implications for public trust in local law enforcement.
This article was automatically written by OpenAI, and the people, facts, circumstances, and story may be inaccurate. Any article can be requested for removal, retraction, or correction by writing an email to contact@publiclawlibrary.org.