Seattle Lawyer Accused of Blocking $1.19 Billion Water Contamination Settlement Denies Allegations, Calls Sanctions Motion an “Intimidation Tactic”

SEATTLE, Washington – A Seattle lawyer is fighting back against allegations that he held up a $1.19 billion water contamination settlement involving DuPont. Jeff Kray, of Marten Law, claims that the sanctions motion filed against him by class counsel is merely an “intimidation tactic” based on a “fantastical conspiracy theory.” Kray argues that class counsel failed to meet with him prior to filing the motion.

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, represented by Kray, is at the center of this legal battle. Mitchell Tilner, an attorney from Horvitz & Levy in Burbank, California, has also appealed the final approval of the DuPont deal on behalf of the water district. This appeal was filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

While the details of the settlement are not provided in this report, it is clear that there are significant disagreements and tensions between the various parties involved. The accusations of misconduct and the subsequent sanctions motion have escalated the conflict even further.

Kray’s response suggests that the motion against him and the two in-house attorneys for the water district is an attempt to intimidate and discredit their legal team. He categorizes the motion as “false, slanderous, meritless, and vexatious.”

It is important to note that this story only offers Kray’s side of the story, without directly quoting any news organizations. However, it does provide insight into the ongoing legal battle surrounding the DuPont water contamination settlement. The appeal filed by Tilner and now the sanctions motion raise questions about the validity and fairness of the settlement agreement.

The next steps in this legal saga remain unclear. Both sides will likely continue to present their arguments to the court, and a resolution may not be reached for some time. The outcome of this case will undoubtedly have significant implications for all parties involved, including DuPont, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, and the individuals affected by the water contamination.