Administration

Supreme Court appears inclined to prevent Trump from firing Fed governor

by

The recent proceedings in the Supreme Court regarding the Federal Reserve have garnered significant attention, particularly concerning President Donald Trump’s authority to dismiss a sitting member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, Lisa Cook. The justices exhibited a notable inclination to safeguard Cook’s position as she challenges the legality of her potential termination. As the case unfolds, it raises critical questions about the balance of power between the presidency and independent agencies. Legal Context of the Case During the oral arguments in the case of Trump v. Cook, the Supreme Court faced two intertwined … Read more

The Fed-firing case in three steps

by

The case surrounding President Donald Trump’s attempt to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook is a significant legal matter that raises complex questions about executive power and administrative law. This situation not only has implications for the Federal Reserve but also for the broader financial markets and governance in the United States. As the Supreme Court prepares to hear this case, the stakes are high, and the outcome could reshape the boundaries of presidential authority. Background of the Case The conflict between Trump and Cook began in August when Cook was removed from her position, … Read more

How deferential is the Roberts court to presidential power?

by

The relationship between the Supreme Court and presidential power has been a focal point of constitutional debate, particularly during the tenure of the Roberts Court. Scholars and commentators alike have expressed concerns about the extent to which the Court defers to executive authority, especially in light of actions taken during the Trump administration. This complex dynamic raises critical questions about the balance of power among the branches of government and the implications for democracy and the rule of law. Understanding the Roberts Court’s Approach to Presidential Power Recent analyses suggest that the Roberts Court may … Read more

Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Effort to Deploy National Guard in Illinois

by

The Supreme Court recently ruled against the Trump administration’s attempt to deploy National Guard troops in Illinois, reaffirming the limitations of presidential authority in this context. This decision marks a significant moment in the ongoing legal battles surrounding the deployment of military resources within U.S. states, particularly in urban areas governed by Democratic leaders. The court’s ruling underscores the delicate balance of power between state and federal authorities, especially regarding law enforcement and public safety measures. Details of the Supreme Court Ruling On a Tuesday in early October, the Supreme Court decided to uphold a … Read more