Commentary

Pinebrook, UT — In a recent opinion piece, local discourse heavily criticized the approach of prominent elected officials to the judiciary processes involving former President Trump. The criticism hones in on their failure to provide objective, factual responses to constituents regarding legal outcomes affecting the ex-president. Richard Hafets sparked controversy by questioning Frans Bicker Caarten’s right to discuss the veracity of the ‘guilty’ verdict against Trump, arguing that Caarten’s lack of a legal background disqualified his opinion. However, this assertion overlooked the broader point in Caarten’s article about the necessity for elected representatives to rise … Read more