Drastically

Judge Drastically Cuts Award in UPS Discrimination Case, Rejects $198 Million in Punitive Damages

by

Yakima, Wash. — In a significant legal adjustment, a federal judge has significantly reduced a punitive damages award against United Parcel Service in a case involving allegations of workplace discrimination and wrongful termination. The initial jury verdict, which sided with former UPS driver Tahvio Gratton, awarded him $237.6 million. However, after further judicial review, the punitive damages were cut down to $39.6 million. The judicial review was prompted by UPS’ appeal, addressing the excessive nature of the punitive award decided by the jury. US District Judge Thomas Rice, ruling on the matter, deemed the original … Read more

Judge Drastically Reduces $38 Million Verdict in New Hampshire Youth Detention Center Abuse Case to $475,000

by

CONCORD, N.H. — A New Hampshire judge has significantly reduced a multimillion-dollar verdict originally awarded to victims of abuse at the state’s youth detention center. The judge’s preliminary ruling decreases the $38 million award down to $475,000, marking a drastic reduction in the compensation that the state is required to pay. This landmark civil trial stems from allegations of widespread abuse that occurred at the Sununu Youth Services Center, formerly known as the Youth Development Center, located in Manchester, New Hampshire. Over the years, the center has been the focus of numerous complaints and legal … Read more

Judge Drastically Reduces Jury Award in Metcalf Case to $20 Million from Initial $100 Million

by

Buffalo, N.Y. — In a recent ruling, a judge has drastically reduced the monetary award granted to Eve Metcalf, a former employee of DynaCorp, from an initial $100 million to $20 million. Metcalf successfully proved her case against the corporation for severe workplace harassment and wrongful termination, leading to a discrepancy in compensation that has captured public and legal attention. The decision to slash the jury’s award came after legal reviews argued the initial sum was excessively punitive. Legal analysts suggest that such a significant decrease is not uncommon in civil litigation, as judges often … Read more

Supreme Court Case Threatens to Drastically Reduce Federal Regulatory Power in Environmental and Healthcare Sectors

by

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Jan. 17, 2024, in two cases that could have far-reaching implications for federal regulatory power. The cases, Loper Bright Enterprises vs. Raimondo and Relentless Inc. vs. Department of Commerce, focus on fisheries management but carry implications for broader federal enforcement of environmental and health care regulations. The central question in these cases is whether the Secretary of Commerce, through the National Marine Fisheries Service, has the authority to require commercial fishers to pay for onboard observers on fishing voyages, as mandated by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery … Read more