Partisanship

Opinion: How Partisanship in the Judiciary Is Eroding Public Trust

by

WASHINGTON — The perceived partisanship of judges and their decisions is casting a long shadow over the judiciary’s respect within public perception. This growing skepticism towards judicial impartiality threatens the foundational trust required for the American legal system to function effectively. The public’s dwindling respect for judges seems to be influenced by several politicized high-profile cases where the decisions appeared aligned with partisan lines, leading to questions about the influence of politics on judicial impartiality. This situation is exacerbated by the nomination and confirmation processes of judges, which are becoming increasingly fraught with partisan conflicts, … Read more

Judge Wynn Reverses Decision on Senior Status, Sparks Controversy Amid Claims of Partisanship

by

WASHINGTON — The U.S. judiciary has often become a focal point in discussions of political bias, with courts facing scrutiny for perceived partisan influences in their decisions. The Fourth Circuit, especially during the early years of the Trump presidency, became one significant battleground. Known for its landmark rulings on various Trump administration policies including the travel ban and the Emoluments Clauses, it has attracted a mix of admiration and criticism. One Fourth Circuit judge, James A. Wynn, appointed by former President Obama, has been particularly notable for his rulings during these years. Often positioned against … Read more