Texas Supreme Court Sheds Light on Challenges of Determining Damages, Calls for Reasoned Decision-Making by Juries

HOUSTON, TEXAS – Last summer, the Texas Supreme Court made a landmark decision to reverse a $15 million jury award in the case of Gregory v. Chohan. The court criticized the plaintiffs’ counsel for failing to provide a rational argument justifying the amount sought or awarded. This case sheds light on the need for juries to be guided in their deliberations and avoid arbitrary methods when determining damages. In civil cases, damages serve two essential purposes: compensating the injured party for their harm and deterring similar wrongful conduct in the future. However, different jurisdictions have … Read more