Bruce Lehrmann’s Defamation Appeal Stumbles as Legal Representation Faces Challenges

Canberra, Australia — Bruce Lehrmann’s appeal in the Full Federal Court regarding defamation findings linked to his alleged rape of Brittany Higgins faced significant challenges during Wednesday’s session. The proceedings, which were initially promising, took a downturn that left him struggling to regain footing. Faced with the absence of a funded barrister, Lehrmann relied on his solicitor, Zali Burrows, to advocate on his behalf. Burrows expressed eagerness for the counsel of Guy Reynolds SC but noted that the barristers who had previously participated in his trial under a contingency fee arrangement had withdrawn from the … Read more

Johnson & Johnson’s Talc Case Stumbles: A Major Setback in Bankruptcy Court’s Tort Battles

Charlotte, North Carolina — Johnson & Johnson faced a significant legal setback as a federal appeals court upheld a ruling that blocks the company from transferring its talc liabilities to a newly formed subsidiary aimed at managing its ongoing lawsuits. This decision comes after numerous cases have been filed against the company, alleging that its talc products contain harmful asbestos, which has been linked to cancer. The company’s attempt to resolve approximately 38,000 pending lawsuits through a controversial bankruptcy strategy has drawn criticism and backlash from various stakeholders. This situation began when Johnson & Johnson … Read more

California’s Legal Battle Stumbles as Appeals Court Rejects Key Lawsuit

SAN FRANCISCO — A federal appeals court has dealt a setback to California’s lawsuit against major internet companies over their alleged impact on competition and market practices. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the state, emphasizing the need for clearer proof of harm before pursuing antitrust claims. The California Attorney General’s Office initiated the lawsuit, targeting well-known tech giants for purportedly engaging in anti-competitive behavior that stifles innovation and limits consumer choices. The case was built on the premise that these companies have a disproportionate influence in their respective marketplaces, drawing criticism from … Read more

Crown Intervenes as Key Witness Stumbles Over Memory in Courtroom Exchange

In a courtroom in Toronto, Canada, tensions flared as a key witness faced intense questioning regarding her interactions with a man involved in a high-profile case. During the proceedings, E.M. was shown footage of her speaking with McLeod at a bar, leading to a gripping exchange with the prosecutor, Brown. Brown pressed E.M. on her previous claims of having no memory of conversations with McLeod, questioning the accuracy of her statements. “In my mind, we hadn’t had any conversations because I didn’t remember any conversations,” E.M. explained, attempting to clarify her position. The prosecutor continued … Read more