FULTON COUNTY, Ga. – Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis is awaiting a decision from Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee on whether she will be disqualified from the Georgia election interference case against former President Donald Trump and his codefendants. The decision comes after allegations of an improper and clandestine relationship between Willis and Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade, whom she hired to lead the investigation. Willis initiated the investigation into potential interference in the 2020 presidential election results. The motion for disqualification was filed by one of Trump’s co-defendants, Michael Roman, who accused Willis of financial gain from the prosecution. Both Willis and Wade have acknowledged the relationship but maintain that it does not affect the case against Trump and that Willis did not profit financially from Wade’s involvement.
During the hearing, attorneys presented arguments and testimony was given, including from Willis and Wade, who denied starting their relationship before Wade’s hiring. The defense claimed that Willis and Wade lied on the witness stand and failed to disclose their relationship when going on romantic vacations together. Roman’s attorney also submitted cellphone data suggesting overnight stays by Wade at Willis’s home before the alleged relationship began. Following the hearing, McAfee expressed concern about the allegations and stated that he would take the necessary time to consider the case thoroughly.
If Willis is disqualified, it would raise questions about the future of the criminal case against Trump and the other defendants. A nonpartisan council in Georgia would be responsible for finding a new attorney to continue the case or drop it altogether. However, McAfee’s recent ruling to quash some counts against Trump and other defendants remains unaffected. The charges are still pending, and the judge stated that prosecutors could seek a new indictment on the dismissed charges if desired.
The decision on disqualification is expected to have significant implications for the high-profile case, which centers on allegations of election interference. Both sides continue to file motions and replies, presenting their arguments. Willis and Wade insist that their relationship does not impact the case’s integrity, while Roman’s attorney argues for disqualification on the grounds of conflict of interest. Ultimately, the judge’s decision will determine the district attorney’s involvement in the case and potentially shape its future trajectory.
Please note: This article does not contain any quotes or references from specific news organizations. The information provided is written in AP News Style and aims to present a concise and objective overview of the situation.