Civil

Justices to Consider $5 Million Verdict Against Trump

by

The ongoing legal battles involving former President Donald Trump have captured the attention of the public and the judiciary alike. As the Supreme Court prepares for its next conference, the focus will be on a civil suit verdict that resulted in a substantial $5 million award against Trump, stemming from allegations made by E. Jean Carroll. This case not only highlights issues of accountability but also raises questions about the intersection of law and politics in America. Background of the Case E. Jean Carroll, a journalist and former advice columnist, filed her lawsuit in 2022, … Read more

SCOTUS Today for Monday, January 12

by

Today marks the commencement of the Supreme Court’s January argument session, during which the justices will deliberate on a range of significant issues. Over the next ten days, the court is set to hear seven arguments, including contentious topics such as the participation of transgender athletes in women’s sports and gun rights. Additionally, there will be discussions surrounding former President Donald Trump’s attempt to remove Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors. Overview of Upcoming Arguments The Supreme Court’s agenda for this session is particularly noteworthy, as it includes pivotal cases that could … Read more

The Worst Supreme Court Case You’ve Never Heard Of, and Its Implications for Immigration Enforcement

by

The Supreme Court has been the battleground for many controversial cases throughout American history, shaping the legal landscape in profound ways. One such case, often overlooked in discussions of civil rights and immigration, is Prigg v. Pennsylvania. This 1842 decision not only reflects the tumultuous relationship between state and federal authority but also offers a lens through which to examine contemporary immigration enforcement under the Trump administration. The case centers around the lives of Margaret and Jerry Morgan, a free Black couple whose story illuminates the complexities of citizenship and legal status in America. Background … Read more

Court Wrestles with Past Conviction and Future Relief

by

The recent case of Olivier v. City of Brandon, Mississippi, has captured the attention of legal experts and civil rights advocates alike. The Supreme Court’s deliberation centers on the implications of a past conviction on an individual’s ability to challenge the constitutionality of a law they have violated. This case raises significant questions about the intersection of law enforcement practices, constitutional rights, and the principle of justice in a democratic society. The Background of the Case The conflict originates from a local ordinance in Brandon, Mississippi, which imposes specific restrictions on demonstrators wishing to protest … Read more