Compares

Jeremy Strong Compares Cannes Jury Experience to ‘Conclave’ as He Celebrates Palme d’Or Win for Jafar Panahi’s Bold Statement on Justice

by

CANNES, France — Actor Jeremy Strong shared his insights and experiences gathered over 11 days as a juror at the Cannes Film Festival, likening the selection process to the papal conclave depicted in the Oscar-nominated film, “Conclave.” Strong, serving on the jury alongside notable figures such as Juliette Binoche and Halle Berry, expressed a profound sense of inspiration gained from the films he viewed during the festival. The jury awarded the Palme d’Or to Jafar Panahi’s “It Was Just an Accident,” a film centered on a group of former prisoners in Iran grappling with the … Read more

"RICO Debate Heats Up: Attorney Compares Prosecutors’ Tactics to Steroid Use in Baseball Amid Lil Durk’s Upcoming Trial"

by

Atlanta, Georgia — In a recent interview with DJ Akademiks, attorney Drew Findling discussed the growing number of RICO cases in the hip-hop community, a phenomenon that has escalated significantly in recent years. Among the cases referenced is the ongoing trial involving Young Slime Life (YSL), which has drawn considerable attention from both fans and legal experts. It’s essential to note that rapper Lil Durk is not currently involved in a federal RICO case. Nonetheless, Findling articulated his concerns about the way some prosecutors are pursuing these cases, likening their tactics to the use of … Read more

Trump Compares DOJ’s January 6th Arguments to Election-Eve Reports

by

Washington, D.C. — Former President Donald Trump recently drew parallels between the Justice Department’s approach to the ongoing Jan. 6 investigations and its handling of issues prior to the 2020 election, specifically critiquing the timing of legal filings and reports. Trump has suggested that current investigative actions, including the Justice Department’s allegations against him, are politically motivated, particularly with the proximity to the impending elections. During the investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, officials released several findings implicating various individuals in efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. Central … Read more

Attorney’s Wild Closing Argument Compares Oxford Mass Shooting to Children’s Kitchen Knife Scenarios

by

Pontiac, Michigan – In a landmark case, Jennifer Crumbley’s attorney delivered a passionate closing argument on Friday, comparing the Oxford mass shooting to hypothetical scenarios of children killing people with kitchen knives. Attorney Shannon Smith made the argument to the jury for over an hour, drawing connections between Crumbley’s home life and her own experiences. She humanized her client, acknowledging that she too, as a lawyer, can become confused when faced with new information. The wide-ranging closing argument also touched on the charge of involuntary manslaughter against Crumbley. Smith drew a parallel between Crumbley potentially … Read more