Discrimination

Oral Argument Live Blog for Tuesday, January 13

by

The Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on January 13 in two significant cases: Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J.. These cases address the contentious issue of transgender athletes’ participation in women’s and girls’ sports teams. As the court prepares to deliberate, the implications of these cases extend beyond the athletes involved, touching on broader questions of equality, fairness, and the rights of transgender individuals in sports. Overview of the Cases In Little v. Hecox, the court will examine the legality of laws that prohibit transgender girls from competing in female … Read more

The transgender athlete cases: an explainer

by

The ongoing debates surrounding transgender athletes have gained significant attention in recent years, particularly as various states enact laws impacting their participation in sports. The legal challenges to these laws have sparked discussions about fairness, inclusion, and the rights of transgender individuals. This explainer will delve into the key cases currently under scrutiny, examining the challengers, the laws in question, and the implications of these legal battles. Key Cases Challenging State Laws Two prominent cases are at the forefront of this legal discourse: Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J.. Both cases involve transgender … Read more

Skrmetti and birth equality (Part V): How the case should have been analyzed

by

The recent Supreme Court decision in United States v. Skrmetti has sparked significant debate regarding the implications of birth equality in the context of legal classifications based on sex and age. The ruling, which permits Tennessee to enforce a law that restricts medical treatments for minors based on their biological sex, raises crucial questions about the intersection of state law, individual rights, and constitutional principles. In this segment, we will analyze the court’s reasoning and explore how the case should have been approached through the lens of birth equality. Understanding the Implications of the Skrmetti … Read more

supreme advocacy: supreme on style, a bit light on substance

by

The documentary titled “Supreme Advocacy: What It Takes to Argue at the Supreme Court,” directed by Andrew Satter, presents a captivating yet somewhat superficial look into the life of a Supreme Court litigator. It follows Roman Martinez, a partner at Latham & Watkins, as he prepares for and argues the case of A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools. This case revolves around the educational accommodations for a teenage girl with severe epilepsy, challenging the existing federal disability discrimination laws. While the film does well in showcasing the advocacy process, it may leave viewers wanting more depth … Read more