Peter Meyer Returns to Faegre Drinker as Partner, Bolstering Indianapolis Team’s Expertise in Medical Product Defense

Indianapolis, Ind. – Faegre Drinker has announced the return of Peter Meyer as a partner in its product liability and mass torts group at the firm’s Indianapolis office. Previously, Meyer held the position of Associate General Counsel at Exactech, where he focused on legal challenges in the medical products sector. Meyer brings a wealth of experience in defending clients against high-stakes multidistrict litigation and mass tort claims. His expertise largely centers on medical device litigation, offering clients a strategic advantage in navigating complex legal scenarios. “Peter is notably skilled in the medical device arena,” said … Read more

Oregon Takes Charge: New Consumer Protection Laws Set to Shield Residents from Medical Debt and Unfair Auto Financing

Salem, Ore. — Beginning in 2026, Oregonians will see significant changes in consumer protections, as new state laws aim to alleviate some of the financial burdens faced by residents. Under these laws, unpaid medical bills will no longer affect credit ratings, and car dealership financing terms cannot be altered after a sale is completed. Governor Tina Kotek recently convened with lawmakers and advocates in Salem to mark the passage of these measures. The legislation, which also includes a requirement for online retailers to disclose fees transparently before customers check out, is a response to gaps … Read more

Federal Judge Halts Trump Administration’s Controversial Bid to Subpoena Transgender Patients’ Medical Records

A federal judge in Boston has intervened in a high-profile dispute involving the Trump administration and the privacy rights of transgender patients receiving medical care. U.S. District Judge Myong Joun ruled on Tuesday against a subpoena issued by the U.S. Department of Justice, aiming to obtain medical records from Boston Children’s Hospital, where transgender individuals receive gender-affirming care. Judge Joun stated that the subpoena was inappropriate and driven by “bad faith.” The Justice Department had claimed that it required the information to investigate possible fraud and off-label drug promotions, but the judge disagreed, finding that … Read more

Pa. Appeals Court Orders New Medical Malpractice Trial Due to Inflammatory Opening Statements and Jury Instruction Flaws

PITTSBURGH — A Pennsylvania appeals court has ruled that a new medical malpractice trial is warranted due to improper opening statements and jury instructions during the original trial. The decision stems from a case involving a patient who alleged that inadequate care led to significant health complications. The three-judge panel’s ruling emphasized that the initial trial proceedings were impacted by prejudicial remarks made by the defendant’s attorney. These statements, deemed misleading, could have swayed the jury’s perception. Legal experts suggest that such comments can severely undermine the fairness of a trial, especially in complex medical … Read more