Immigration

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Trump’s Challenge to Birthright Citizenship

by

The Supreme Court has announced its decision to hear a pivotal case concerning President Donald Trump’s executive order aimed at altering the long-standing principle of birthright citizenship in the United States. This case, which will be argued early next year, ignites a significant debate over the interpretation of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. The executive order in question seeks to deny automatic citizenship to children born in the U.S. if their parents are undocumented or temporarily residing in the country. Background of Birthright Citizenship Birthright citizenship has been a fundamental aspect of American law … Read more

Trump Administration Seeks Supreme Court Resolution on Immigration Judges’ Policy

by

In a continuing legal battle, the Trump administration has formally requested the Supreme Court’s intervention regarding the authority and operational procedures of immigration judges. This request marks the 32nd time since late January that the administration has sought emergency relief from the highest court in the United States. The core of the dispute revolves around a policy that restricts immigration judges from participating in official speaking engagements without prior approval, a matter that has significant implications for the judges’ First Amendment rights. Background of the Dispute The controversy began when the National Association of Immigration … Read more

Government’s Position in Asylum Case Could Incentivize Unauthorized Migration

by

The complexities surrounding asylum applications in the United States have been a topic of significant legal scrutiny, particularly in light of recent governmental strategies aimed at regulating the influx of asylum seekers. Traditionally, the process of applying for asylum has been straightforward: individuals needed only to arrive in the U.S. and express their need for protection. However, shifts in policy during the past decade have introduced barriers that may inadvertently affect the motivations of migrants seeking refuge. Legal Context of Asylum Applications Asylum law in the United States permits individuals who are physically present or … Read more

Supreme Court to Consider Federal Courts’ Role in Asylum Cases

by

On December 1, the Supreme Court will deliberate on the case of Urias-Orellana v. Bondi, focusing on the critical role of federal courts in asylum proceedings. This case raises significant questions about whether federal appellate courts should defer to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) when evaluating claims made by asylum seekers. The decision could have far-reaching implications for countless individuals seeking refuge from persecution. Background of the Case The legal challenge originates from the asylum application of Douglas Humberto Urias-Orellana, Sayra Iliana Gamez-Mejia, and their minor child, who fled El Salvador in 2021. They … Read more