Immigration

Supreme Court to Consider Federal Courts’ Role in Asylum Cases

by

On December 1, the Supreme Court will deliberate on the case of Urias-Orellana v. Bondi, focusing on the critical role of federal courts in asylum proceedings. This case raises significant questions about whether federal appellate courts should defer to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) when evaluating claims made by asylum seekers. The decision could have far-reaching implications for countless individuals seeking refuge from persecution. Background of the Case The legal challenge originates from the asylum application of Douglas Humberto Urias-Orellana, Sayra Iliana Gamez-Mejia, and their minor child, who fled El Salvador in 2021. They … Read more

Supreme Court does not act on Trump’s attempt to end birthright citizenship – for now

by

The Supreme Court’s recent inaction on President Donald Trump’s executive order to end birthright citizenship has left many legal experts pondering the implications of this significant constitutional issue. The order, which seeks to deny automatic citizenship to individuals born on U.S. soil, has raised questions about the interpretation of the 14th Amendment. As the court prepares to reconsider the case, the potential outcomes could have lasting effects on immigration policy and citizenship rights in the United States. Supreme Court’s Relist Procedure On Monday, the Supreme Court chose not to act on the challenges to Trump’s … Read more

Birthright Citizenship and American Exceptionalism

by

Birthright citizenship, a principle enshrined in the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, has been a cornerstone of American identity since its ratification in 1868. This policy grants citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil, regardless of the immigration status of their parents. However, in recent years, this long-standing tradition has come under scrutiny, particularly during the Trump administration, which sought to limit access to birthright citizenship through executive orders. This debate not only underscores the complexities of immigration policy but also raises questions about American exceptionalism and the values associated with it. The Global … Read more

Borderlines, Benchslaps, and Burdens of Proof

by

The legal landscape surrounding immigration, federal authority, and the interpretation of statutes continues to evolve, particularly in light of recent Supreme Court cases. The discussions surrounding these cases often highlight the delicate balance between state and federal powers, as well as the implications of judicial interpretations on policy and individual rights. Understanding these nuances is essential for comprehending how borderlines, both literal and figurative, shape the legal framework within which these cases operate. Borderlines in Immigration Law The Immigration and Nationality Act stipulates that an alien who “arrives in the United States” can apply for … Read more