Immigration

Challenging Politically Discriminatory Funding Cuts

by

In recent years, the political landscape in the United States has witnessed an alarming trend where federal funding is increasingly being used as a tool for political discrimination. The Trump Administration’s approach to withholding federal funds from certain states and cities, particularly those labeled as “sanctuary jurisdictions,” raises significant legal and ethical questions. This tactic, often employed to enforce compliance with federal immigration policies, has sparked a series of legal challenges that delve into the constitutional implications of such actions. Legal Framework Surrounding Funding Cuts The legal arguments against the President’s unilateral funding cuts primarily … Read more

Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Effort to Deploy National Guard in Illinois

by

The Supreme Court has made a significant decision regarding the Trump administration’s authority to deploy National Guard troops in Illinois. On a recent Tuesday, the Court upheld a ruling from a federal judge in Chicago that prohibits the deployment, emphasizing the limitations on military intervention in state matters. This ruling reflects the ongoing legal and political debates surrounding the balance of power between federal and state authorities, particularly in the context of immigration enforcement and public safety. Details of the Supreme Court’s Ruling The Supreme Court’s decision came in response to a request from the … Read more

The Worst Supreme Court Case You’ve Never Heard Of, and Its Implications for Immigration Enforcement

by

The Supreme Court has been the battleground for many controversial cases throughout American history, shaping the legal landscape in profound ways. One such case, often overlooked in discussions of civil rights and immigration, is Prigg v. Pennsylvania. This 1842 decision not only reflects the tumultuous relationship between state and federal authority but also offers a lens through which to examine contemporary immigration enforcement under the Trump administration. The case centers around the lives of Margaret and Jerry Morgan, a free Black couple whose story illuminates the complexities of citizenship and legal status in America. Background … Read more

Off-ramp remains to birthright citizenship decision

by

The ongoing legal debates surrounding birthright citizenship in the United States have reached a critical juncture as the Supreme Court prepares to deliberate on significant cases that could redefine the interpretation of citizenship rights. The implications of these cases extend beyond legal technicalities, touching on fundamental questions of identity, belonging, and the future of immigration policy. With the backdrop of President Donald Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship, the court’s decisions will likely have far-reaching consequences for millions. Legal Landscape of Birthright Citizenship In September 2023, Solicitor General D. John Sauer urged the Supreme Court … Read more