Immunity

ECtHR Upholds Judicial Immunity in Landmark Akay v. Turkey Case

by

Strasbourg, France – In a significant ruling that underscores the protective cloak extended to international jurists, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has decided in favor of Judge Aydin Sefa Akay, a U.N. judge who found himself embroiled in legal turmoil back in his home country, Turkey. This decision not only reaffirmed the immunities typically granted to international judges but also highlighted the challenges these judges face when their roles in international courts intersect with national jurisdictions. The case originated when Judge Akay, who was serving on a United Nations Mechanism for International Criminal … Read more

Supreme Court’s Latest Immunity Decision Raises Alarms Over Democratic Principles

by

Washington, D.C. — In a recent landmark decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has again changed the legal landscape, redefining the protection from lawsuit immunity traditionally granted to federal officers, a move that some experts argue could have profound implications for democratic accountability. This tightening of conditions under which officials can be held immune poses questions about the balance between maintaining governmental function and ensuring citizens can seek redress against abuses of power. The ruling circles back to concerns about what many see as a widening gap between governmental authority and individual rights. It highlights a … Read more

Trump Legal Team Seeks to Halt DOJ’s Extended Brief in Presidential Immunity Debate Amid Election Charges

by

WASHINGTON — Attorneys representing former President Donald Trump are taking legal action to prevent federal prosecutors from submitting an expansive initial brief in his election interference case, highlighting concerns with the document’s unprecedented length and timing before the election. The motion, filed this Monday, challenges the Department of Justice’s request to submit an opening brief reportedly four times the typical limit allowed in the District of Columbia, setting up a significant procedural fight in this consequential case. Trump, who faces four felony charges accusing him of trying to overturn the 2020 election results, is being … Read more

New York Judge to Decide: Can Taliban Leader Claim War-Related Immunity?

by

New York – A pivotal legal question looms in a New York City courtroom: should a Taliban leader be granted immunity for actions considered linked to war? This complex issue intertwines international law, US foreign policy, and the historical contexts of armed conflict in Afghanistan, posing a challenge for the judicial system. The Taliban leader in question is alleged to have committed crimes that some argue may be shielded by war-related immunity, which traditionally protects heads of state and diplomats under certain international law conditions. The defense posits that his actions, in his role within … Read more